Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Strong Fighter, Wimpy Mage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Legildur" data-source="post: 2873581" data-attributes="member: 1258"><p>Exactly. Unearthed Arcana was aware of this and included rules around using the <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/adventuring/bellCurveRolls.htm" target="_blank">3d6 bell curve</a> instead of a single d20. (blasphemy, I know, but there you have it)</p><p></p><p>I have read somewhere (DMG perhaps?) where it says for some skill checks to roll a single d20 and then add the individual PCs' skill modifiers to the die result to derive their individual skill check results. I think the discussion was around Spot checks, otherwise there is a high probability that at least someone will see the craftily hidden ambusher simply because of rolling 4 lots of d20 and the probability of obtaining at least one high result. Could you apply the same method in the situation with the door?</p><p></p><p>But what bugs me is when the 18 Strength fighter assists the 24 Strength raging half-orc barbarian in lifting a portcullis and gets a higher result, which may be enough to open the portcullis on his own, but is wasted as the fighter only needs a DC 10 result to assist the barbarian and the result is discounted. In these sorts of situations, we have house ruled that the higher of the two results is used with the +2 from the assistance if the other character made the DC 10 check.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Legildur, post: 2873581, member: 1258"] Exactly. Unearthed Arcana was aware of this and included rules around using the [URL=http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/adventuring/bellCurveRolls.htm]3d6 bell curve[/URL] instead of a single d20. (blasphemy, I know, but there you have it) I have read somewhere (DMG perhaps?) where it says for some skill checks to roll a single d20 and then add the individual PCs' skill modifiers to the die result to derive their individual skill check results. I think the discussion was around Spot checks, otherwise there is a high probability that at least someone will see the craftily hidden ambusher simply because of rolling 4 lots of d20 and the probability of obtaining at least one high result. Could you apply the same method in the situation with the door? But what bugs me is when the 18 Strength fighter assists the 24 Strength raging half-orc barbarian in lifting a portcullis and gets a higher result, which may be enough to open the portcullis on his own, but is wasted as the fighter only needs a DC 10 result to assist the barbarian and the result is discounted. In these sorts of situations, we have house ruled that the higher of the two results is used with the +2 from the assistance if the other character made the DC 10 check. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Strong Fighter, Wimpy Mage
Top