Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 2877816" data-attributes="member: 5889">Sure there are ways to deal with the extrememes, but instead of changing the principal math the game is based on (d20 vs 2d10 vs 3d6 etc) why not just have the dm fix the extremems with a little dm fiat?Okay in the 1 in 100,000,000 chance that there's actually a situation where a baby is going against a troll and then the 9% chance the baby actually wins, then the dm just has the troll knock down the door. Far simplier than changing the whole system<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Also, if you would like, you can grant a large creature a +4 mod to the strength check per size category larger. Large creatures get a +4 to break objects, so it has some precedence.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 2877816, member: 5889"] Sure there are ways to deal with the extrememes, but instead of changing the principal math the game is based on (d20 vs 2d10 vs 3d6 etc) why not just have the dm fix the extremems with a little dm fiat? Okay in the 1 in 100,000,000 chance that there's actually a situation where a baby is going against a troll and then the 9% chance the baby actually wins, then the dm just has the troll knock down the door. Far simplier than changing the whole system:) Also, if you would like, you can grant a large creature a +4 mod to the strength check per size category larger. Large creatures get a +4 to break objects, so it has some precedence. [/QUOTE]

Verification