Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stuff from your favorite edition you DON'T want in Next
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cyberen" data-source="post: 6073204" data-attributes="member: 69074"><p>Elaborating on the "playing lute" thing, according to my experience :* BXCMI : "DM, may I play the lute ?". Inconsistent answer, depending on the last grade obtained by the DM (we were 10) - rulings, not rules, as the game recognized that characters created by the dozen to explore subterranean mazes needn't be fully fleshed out, as they probably won't leave the dungeon alive. At least, the game encouraged players to broaden their character progrssively and gives a very good sense of a broader world (your murdering hobo might not play the lute, but he is looking forward to hire lute players when he hits name level)At * ADD : When you ask your DM he tells you to wait until next session. He then comes back with a gonzo table where you roll 2d8 and a 16 means Iuz & St Cuthbert come to hear the performance.* 2e : can't remember.* 3e : at least, you get proper rules ! Of course, they entail that you have to kill lots of things to be a good lute player, and that, if you dedicate yourself to the way of the lute, you'll get screwed by refusing to take spot like everyone else, especially if you're a fighter. Of course, you could also be a half-cestial Cleric 2/ Rogue 1/ Bard 2 / Mystic Lute player (from the complete badass musician handbook) wielding a +6 Lute of awesomeness.*4e : by player fiat, i guess you could declare yourself a lute player. You'll need to roll checks to get some effect, which would be adjudicated in a level appropriate manner (to use one of your power, one of your skill, or a p42 effect)... Even against deaf opponents.BXCMI feels too basic, ADD too gonzo, 3E too serious, 4E too abstract.I hope Next will keep : rulings rather than comprehensive rules, name level where killing thing and taking their stuff recedes to the background, a stable engine hard to derail, capability to create diverse characters, easy to create & fun to use monsters, world building (even at the expense of story building, ie unlike 4e). I am confident !</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cyberen, post: 6073204, member: 69074"] Elaborating on the "playing lute" thing, according to my experience :* BXCMI : "DM, may I play the lute ?". Inconsistent answer, depending on the last grade obtained by the DM (we were 10) - rulings, not rules, as the game recognized that characters created by the dozen to explore subterranean mazes needn't be fully fleshed out, as they probably won't leave the dungeon alive. At least, the game encouraged players to broaden their character progrssively and gives a very good sense of a broader world (your murdering hobo might not play the lute, but he is looking forward to hire lute players when he hits name level)At * ADD : When you ask your DM he tells you to wait until next session. He then comes back with a gonzo table where you roll 2d8 and a 16 means Iuz & St Cuthbert come to hear the performance.* 2e : can't remember.* 3e : at least, you get proper rules ! Of course, they entail that you have to kill lots of things to be a good lute player, and that, if you dedicate yourself to the way of the lute, you'll get screwed by refusing to take spot like everyone else, especially if you're a fighter. Of course, you could also be a half-cestial Cleric 2/ Rogue 1/ Bard 2 / Mystic Lute player (from the complete badass musician handbook) wielding a +6 Lute of awesomeness.*4e : by player fiat, i guess you could declare yourself a lute player. You'll need to roll checks to get some effect, which would be adjudicated in a level appropriate manner (to use one of your power, one of your skill, or a p42 effect)... Even against deaf opponents.BXCMI feels too basic, ADD too gonzo, 3E too serious, 4E too abstract.I hope Next will keep : rulings rather than comprehensive rules, name level where killing thing and taking their stuff recedes to the background, a stable engine hard to derail, capability to create diverse characters, easy to create & fun to use monsters, world building (even at the expense of story building, ie unlike 4e). I am confident ! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stuff from your favorite edition you DON'T want in Next
Top