Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stun: The Fun-Killer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Distracted DM" data-source="post: 9296606" data-attributes="member: 6894926"><p>Ok, so like the title says, Stun sucks. It especially sucks for players- sorry, you don't get a turn- guess you should've passed that save against Mind Blast!</p><p>It's sucked in previous editions too, and in other systems I love like 13th Age. Sure there's still Paralyze, but usually something can be done about that.</p><p></p><p>So I came up with this, it's kind of like a hybrid between stunned and slow.</p><p></p><p><strong>Proposed Stun house rule:</strong></p><p></p><p><em>A stunned creature's speed is halved; it can speak only falteringly. </em></p><p><em>A stunned creature cannot take reactions or concentrate.</em></p><p><em>On its turn, a stunned creature can take either an action or a bonus action, not both. In addition, it can't make more than one melee or ranged attack during its turn. Its attack rolls and ability checks are made at Disadvantage.</em></p><p><em>It automatically fails Strength and Dexterity saving throws. </em></p><p><em>Attack rolls against the creature have advantage.</em></p><p></p><p>At least the creature has options, even if they're not going to be the greatest options.</p><p><strong>What do y'all think? Any issues that arise? </strong></p><p></p><p>Edit1: I’d want to add wording preventing complex actions like casting leveled spells and using a5e maneuvers, but wording that and figuring out where the line should be drawn would require a bit more thought.</p><p>Edit2: Added Disadvantage to ability checks as well as attacks.</p><p>Another consideration: should creatures only be able to move OR action/bonus action? Is that too debilitating? It seems that anything is an improvement over the current "nothing."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Distracted DM, post: 9296606, member: 6894926"] Ok, so like the title says, Stun sucks. It especially sucks for players- sorry, you don't get a turn- guess you should've passed that save against Mind Blast! It's sucked in previous editions too, and in other systems I love like 13th Age. Sure there's still Paralyze, but usually something can be done about that. So I came up with this, it's kind of like a hybrid between stunned and slow. [B]Proposed Stun house rule:[/B] [I]A stunned creature's speed is halved; it can speak only falteringly. A stunned creature cannot take reactions or concentrate. On its turn, a stunned creature can take either an action or a bonus action, not both. In addition, it can't make more than one melee or ranged attack during its turn. Its attack rolls and ability checks are made at Disadvantage. It automatically fails Strength and Dexterity saving throws. Attack rolls against the creature have advantage.[/I] At least the creature has options, even if they're not going to be the greatest options. [B]What do y'all think? Any issues that arise? [/B] Edit1: I’d want to add wording preventing complex actions like casting leveled spells and using a5e maneuvers, but wording that and figuring out where the line should be drawn would require a bit more thought. Edit2: Added Disadvantage to ability checks as well as attacks. Another consideration: should creatures only be able to move OR action/bonus action? Is that too debilitating? It seems that anything is an improvement over the current "nothing." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stun: The Fun-Killer
Top