Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stunlock: A DM's Worst Nightmare
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tequila Sunrise" data-source="post: 5870416" data-attributes="member: 40398"><p>Hi, UK!</p><p></p><p>Before I continue, I'll mention the last play test I ran, where the solo could attempt saves by taking damage. As expected, it played out very similarly to the control play test where nobody had stun powers -- the solo went down relatively quickly, but made the invoker really sweat on its way down. If the PCs didn't have all of their dailies to unload, the invoker may have KOed once or twice!</p><p></p><p>All in all, this test showed the best results. Although I'd still like to find a "consolation prize" other than damage that doesn't require tracking.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Correct.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In a real game, it probably wouldn't be possible to load up on so many stun powers without begging the DM for home brew. But as [MENTION=43019]keterys[/MENTION] mentioned, there are a lot of powers that accomplish basically the same goal: dominate, "target can't attack," etc.</p><p></p><p>So at 28th level at least, I think it's very possible for the party to be able to blow two stun-ish powers per round for a few rounds at least. This is a worst-case scenario though, so whether it actually happens depends on your crew. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think it depends on how you design monsters. If you have an effective and satisfying standardized trait, as I'm working toward, I think that's enough. If each of your solos is a special snowflake and you have the energy to individualize more, specific anti-effect traits may be more interesting for your players. Or it might go right over their heads, I dunno. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Glad to be of service!</p><p></p><p>I will reference D'karr again though, and agree that it is rather frustrating on the player's side when a monster simply shrugs off an effect at the start of its turn. (Your solos have the usual +5 bonus, yes?) I'd recommend at least being upfront and explicit with your players about this: "My solos roll saves at the start of their turn, so expect solos to largely ignore anything but damage."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tequila Sunrise, post: 5870416, member: 40398"] Hi, UK! Before I continue, I'll mention the last play test I ran, where the solo could attempt saves by taking damage. As expected, it played out very similarly to the control play test where nobody had stun powers -- the solo went down relatively quickly, but made the invoker really sweat on its way down. If the PCs didn't have all of their dailies to unload, the invoker may have KOed once or twice! All in all, this test showed the best results. Although I'd still like to find a "consolation prize" other than damage that doesn't require tracking. Correct. In a real game, it probably wouldn't be possible to load up on so many stun powers without begging the DM for home brew. But as [MENTION=43019]keterys[/MENTION] mentioned, there are a lot of powers that accomplish basically the same goal: dominate, "target can't attack," etc. So at 28th level at least, I think it's very possible for the party to be able to blow two stun-ish powers per round for a few rounds at least. This is a worst-case scenario though, so whether it actually happens depends on your crew. ;) I think it depends on how you design monsters. If you have an effective and satisfying standardized trait, as I'm working toward, I think that's enough. If each of your solos is a special snowflake and you have the energy to individualize more, specific anti-effect traits may be more interesting for your players. Or it might go right over their heads, I dunno. :erm: Glad to be of service! I will reference D'karr again though, and agree that it is rather frustrating on the player's side when a monster simply shrugs off an effect at the start of its turn. (Your solos have the usual +5 bonus, yes?) I'd recommend at least being upfront and explicit with your players about this: "My solos roll saves at the start of their turn, so expect solos to largely ignore anything but damage." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stunlock: A DM's Worst Nightmare
Top