Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 3968147" data-attributes="member: 48965">Uhm...just what are you talking about here?&nbsp; Please re-read the series of posts that led to me stating this.&nbsp; I suggested that the feats have descriptive, utilitarian names in the PHB, with an optional sidebar talking about changing names.&nbsp; Then asked why this would be worse than having feats with abstract names already designated to them.&nbsp; Mustrum then replied...and...to which I replied...Then Will replied...Which last but not least, I replied as follows...So, I'm not getting where you're coming from with the &quot;Advanced Player&quot; bit...I never specified a player had to have a degree in featology to come up with their own names.&nbsp; In fact I think it's simple as well, but the argument put forth by Will implied this would lead to dazed and confused players who can't keep track of their feats and the names they created for them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 3968147, member: 48965"] Uhm...just what are you talking about here? Please re-read the series of posts that led to me stating this. I suggested that the feats have descriptive, utilitarian names in the PHB, with an optional sidebar talking about changing names. Then asked why this would be worse than having feats with abstract names already designated to them. Mustrum then replied... and... to which I replied... Then Will replied... Which last but not least, I replied as follows... So, I'm not getting where you're coming from with the "Advanced Player" bit...I never specified a player had to have a degree in featology to come up with their own names. In fact I think it's simple as well, but the argument put forth by Will implied this would lead to dazed and confused players who can't keep track of their feats and the names they created for them. [/QUOTE]

Verification