Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Subclass and Feat Path thoughts (+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silam" data-source="post: 9890413" data-attributes="member: 7055898"><p>This is a bummer, but also an opportunity.</p><p></p><p>It is seen as normal to reach 20 in your main stat by level 20. With a stat at 15 from point buy and a +2 from a background, that means you can start at 17 and need just 1.5 ASIs or 3 half-feats. If you were frugal with point buy and/or you slammed the wall of sucky backgrounds at a table that didn’t allow custom ones, you may be further away from the goal of a 20. Then there are MAD builds who would ideally end up with 2 x 20s, which is 3.5 ASIs or a whopping 7 half-feats if starting from the optimal 16 and 17 (often difficult with PHB backgrounds).</p><p></p><p>Why am I saying this is an opportunity, rather than a major bummer?</p><p></p><p>Because it means the ceiling for acceptable power creep in new feats is still fairly high above the status quo.</p><p></p><p>Consider that a +1 bump to a stat mod provides +1 to attack/damage/DCs, one save, a few skills, and maybe other mechanics (AC, init, feature usage / day…). It’s a lot, and that’s why we want those stats at 20. But in terms of creating new feats, it means (roughly speaking) that if a feat gave a +1 to ALL of that it would be balanced! (That’s not quite true because if you had a stat at 20 and tacked on that hypothetical feat on top then you’d get effectively to 22, and let’s say that’s too much…).</p><p></p><p>But what it means is that half feats and especially full feats can afford to be more powerful than the current crop of available feats without utterly breaking the game. There is slack in the system. If a collection of many good full feats are competitive with ASIs, then a player might not mind letting their build finish level 20 with a main stat of 18 or maybe even 16. If they do choose to have their main stat at +4 or even +3 rather than +5, then that is a fairly big nerf, and it can justify getting a big boost from cool feats in exchange.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Emphasis mine. This is key. Presenting feats well and not just alphabetically is critical for adoption.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silam, post: 9890413, member: 7055898"] This is a bummer, but also an opportunity. It is seen as normal to reach 20 in your main stat by level 20. With a stat at 15 from point buy and a +2 from a background, that means you can start at 17 and need just 1.5 ASIs or 3 half-feats. If you were frugal with point buy and/or you slammed the wall of sucky backgrounds at a table that didn’t allow custom ones, you may be further away from the goal of a 20. Then there are MAD builds who would ideally end up with 2 x 20s, which is 3.5 ASIs or a whopping 7 half-feats if starting from the optimal 16 and 17 (often difficult with PHB backgrounds). Why am I saying this is an opportunity, rather than a major bummer? Because it means the ceiling for acceptable power creep in new feats is still fairly high above the status quo. Consider that a +1 bump to a stat mod provides +1 to attack/damage/DCs, one save, a few skills, and maybe other mechanics (AC, init, feature usage / day…). It’s a lot, and that’s why we want those stats at 20. But in terms of creating new feats, it means (roughly speaking) that if a feat gave a +1 to ALL of that it would be balanced! (That’s not quite true because if you had a stat at 20 and tacked on that hypothetical feat on top then you’d get effectively to 22, and let’s say that’s too much…). But what it means is that half feats and especially full feats can afford to be more powerful than the current crop of available feats without utterly breaking the game. There is slack in the system. If a collection of many good full feats are competitive with ASIs, then a player might not mind letting their build finish level 20 with a main stat of 18 or maybe even 16. If they do choose to have their main stat at +4 or even +3 rather than +5, then that is a fairly big nerf, and it can justify getting a big boost from cool feats in exchange. Emphasis mine. This is key. Presenting feats well and not just alphabetically is critical for adoption. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Subclass and Feat Path thoughts (+)
Top