Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mellored" data-source="post: 8834482" data-attributes="member: 6801209">As long as levels 5/11/17 are more powerful than level 1, it will be very difficult to have multiclassing be more powerful than a base class.Also, as long as the power difference isn't huge.&nbsp; I really have no problem with multiclassing being a little better.If some combination of classes deals 5% more damage, then that's a little reward for those who get into the game more.If some combination of classes deals 50% more damage, then that's bad for the game.As far a limiting choices at 1 to help new players.&nbsp; I like more choices and I like new players....<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f914.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure&nbsp; &nbsp; :unsure:"&nbsp; data-smilie="24"data-shortname=":unsure:" /> I would probably have to lean on the side of new players.&nbsp; Including having casters start with a pre-selected set of spells, pre-selected equipment, spell preparation at level 2, and then subclass at level 3.Lets move the complexity to higher levels and encourage more experience gamers to start at higher levels.A first subclass at 3, 6, 9.&nbsp; And the a second subclass at level 13, 16, 19 would be cool.&nbsp; Including taking a second on in your class as well as some multiclass - sub classes.So you could have a rogue that takes arcane trickster at 3, 6, 9 and then assassin at 13, 16, 19.Or a rogue that takes ranger at 3, 6, 9 and bard at 13, 16, 19.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mellored, post: 8834482, member: 6801209"] As long as levels 5/11/17 are more powerful than level 1, it will be very difficult to have multiclassing be more powerful than a base class. Also, as long as the power difference isn't huge. I really have no problem with multiclassing being a little better. If some combination of classes deals 5% more damage, then that's a little reward for those who get into the game more. If some combination of classes deals 50% more damage, then that's bad for the game. As far a limiting choices at 1 to help new players. I like more choices [I][B]and[/B][/I] I like new players....:unsure: I would probably have to lean on the side of new players. Including having casters start with a pre-selected set of spells, pre-selected equipment, spell preparation at level 2, and then subclass at level 3. Lets move the complexity to higher levels and encourage more experience gamers to start at higher levels. A first subclass at 3, 6, 9. And the a second subclass at level 13, 16, 19 would be cool. Including taking a second on in your class as well as some multiclass - sub classes. So you could have a rogue that takes arcane trickster at 3, 6, 9 and then assassin at 13, 16, 19. Or a rogue that takes ranger at 3, 6, 9 and bard at 13, 16, 19. [/QUOTE]

Verification