Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Submitted for Your Consideration: Changes to ORIGINS Awards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Monte At Home" data-source="post: 980737" data-attributes="member: 1335"><p>Your assessment isn't incorrect. However, the unfortunate truth is that I'd trust the fans to have better knowledge of a wide selection of game products than the professionals. The majority of game industry folks just don't read each other's work (although I know this isn't true of you). Most of them will even admit that to you. I myself am getting woefully ignorant on new non-D20 game releases out there. (One of the many reasons I pay more attention to the ENnies more than the Origin Awards.)</p><p></p><p>Thus, I think the weak link of the Origins Awards process is the closed, Academy members only nomination round.</p><p></p><p>I like Ryan's proposal a lot. If it has a weakness it's that it depends too much on the folks in the industry. Another way to put it is, if we're going to have a popularity contest, I'd rather be the most popular among game players than the most popular among game designers. </p><p></p><p>(It is interesting, though, that his proposal, having the top sellers in a category automatically put on the ballot, gives game players some say in the nominees, in a round-about fashion. Very sneaky, Ryan.)</p><p></p><p>A sadly cynical side comment: Like so many of us in the Industry, I've seen many Origins Award ceremonies come and go--15 of them since I've been involved professionally--and it seems that virtually everyone is dissatisfied with how they work. I applaud Ryan for trying to fix them. More power to him, and I support him. At this point, I'd be happy to see anything new implemented, just to get a change. But as for myself, I've given up trying to think of ways to fix the awards. I spent the first half of my professional career coming up with all the things wrong with the awards, and ways to fix them, and the second half realizing all the reasons why the fixes I thought of wouldn't work and how the system is so inherently flawed that it's not worth trying to fix. (And yes, I say this as someone who's won Origins Awards.) I sincerely congratulate all the winners of the Origins Awards. I've little doubt that a great deal of work and creativity went into each and every product that won an award (I can vouch for Heroclix). </p><p></p><p>However, I heartily support the ENnies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Monte At Home, post: 980737, member: 1335"] Your assessment isn't incorrect. However, the unfortunate truth is that I'd trust the fans to have better knowledge of a wide selection of game products than the professionals. The majority of game industry folks just don't read each other's work (although I know this isn't true of you). Most of them will even admit that to you. I myself am getting woefully ignorant on new non-D20 game releases out there. (One of the many reasons I pay more attention to the ENnies more than the Origin Awards.) Thus, I think the weak link of the Origins Awards process is the closed, Academy members only nomination round. I like Ryan's proposal a lot. If it has a weakness it's that it depends too much on the folks in the industry. Another way to put it is, if we're going to have a popularity contest, I'd rather be the most popular among game players than the most popular among game designers. (It is interesting, though, that his proposal, having the top sellers in a category automatically put on the ballot, gives game players some say in the nominees, in a round-about fashion. Very sneaky, Ryan.) A sadly cynical side comment: Like so many of us in the Industry, I've seen many Origins Award ceremonies come and go--15 of them since I've been involved professionally--and it seems that virtually everyone is dissatisfied with how they work. I applaud Ryan for trying to fix them. More power to him, and I support him. At this point, I'd be happy to see anything new implemented, just to get a change. But as for myself, I've given up trying to think of ways to fix the awards. I spent the first half of my professional career coming up with all the things wrong with the awards, and ways to fix them, and the second half realizing all the reasons why the fixes I thought of wouldn't work and how the system is so inherently flawed that it's not worth trying to fix. (And yes, I say this as someone who's won Origins Awards.) I sincerely congratulate all the winners of the Origins Awards. I've little doubt that a great deal of work and creativity went into each and every product that won an award (I can vouch for Heroclix). However, I heartily support the ENnies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Submitted for Your Consideration: Changes to ORIGINS Awards
Top