Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Subtle Brilliance...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 1647008" data-attributes="member: 94"><p>Ok, Turanil-- lighten up. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> It's just a game, and you're the GM, after all-- you can do whatever you want.</p><p></p><p>Here's a little secret: You don't <em>have</em> to be <em>fair</em>. Well, you do-- you need to be impartial, of course-- but it's OK if your monsters and villains can do things that your PCs can't. </p><p></p><p><em>The heroes' lot in life is to struggle against the odds.</em> </p><p></p><p>This is a rewarding gaming experience.</p><p></p><p>Conan never cast a spell, and he ran up against countless supernatural foes. I never once heard him complain, "How come Thulsa Doom can do that and I can't?"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree. You've already mentioned action points and defense bonuses, which make a difference, but are not the main difference, in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>The main advantage of a Modern/GT style character is <em>customization</em>. When a GT character decides he wants to be good at something, he will be very, very good at it. </p><p></p><p>A talent <em>within your specialty</em> every 2nd level and a feat <em>within your specialty</em> every other level, plus all the feats that a D&D character normally gets? You can pick and choose and min/max a very effective character. (I'm talking primarily now about non-spellcasters-- spellcasting changes things quite a bit.)</p><p></p><p>For the most simple comparison, put a Fighter side by side with a Strong Hero.</p><p></p><p>Same BAB.</p><p>Same skill points.</p><p>Both get a Feat of their choosing every 3rd character level.</p><p></p><p>Fighter has slightly better HD (d10 vs d8).</p><p>Fighter has slightly better Saves.</p><p></p><p>Fighter gets a bonus feat every 2nd level.</p><p>Strong hero gets a bonus feat every 2nd level.</p><p></p><p>Here's where they diverge:</p><p></p><p>The Strong hero gets a Talent every odd level!</p><p></p><p>Being able to pick and choose the abilities you want to tweak out your character is very, very effective.</p><p></p><p>Actually, I think the rogue is the hardest non-spellcasting class to keep pace with. Rogues enjoy a lot of class abilities that scale very quickly and can outpace a GT character. Unless the GT "rogue" is willing to forgo some of his abilities to specialize, I think the rogue will be more broadly useful.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But you could... You won't break anything. If you want to use a published adventure, say, that includes an 8th level barbarian-- why exactly couldn't you just do it? There's nothing magical about the fact that he's called a barbarian (and not, for example, a Strong/Tough/Fast hero); at the end of the day he boils down to a bunch of numbers and mechanics, and you'll find those numbers and mechanics compatible with everything your Grim Tales PCs can do.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. Why? If action points were granted by a luckstone and defense was an unnamed bonus granted by an ioun stone, would that be <em>strange</em>?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First, let's separate spellcasting from spell-like abilities. There's no reason that creatures with spell-like abilities wouldn't carry on using them as they always have, side by side with characters who may or may not have spellcasting ability, be it D&D spellcasting or GT spellcasting. This disparity already exists even in standard D&D. Nobody ever asks why the efreeti can cast <em>wall of fire</em> at will, but the PCs have to cast <em>wall of fire</em> as a spell.</p><p></p><p>If you're playing D&D and none of your players chooses to play a spellcaster, does that suddenly mean that all of your monsters have to suddenly forget how to use their spell-like abilities and spells?</p><p></p><p>So if you can separate that in your mind, why can't you also allow spellcasting villains that can actually cast spells differently from your PCs? Why couldn't the villain be a sorcerer, or a wizard, learning and casting spells using knowledge that is unattainable by your PCs? (Think Thulsa Doom again, here...)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Very easy: Just allow it. Game on!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wulf Ratbane, post: 1647008, member: 94"] Ok, Turanil-- lighten up. ;) It's just a game, and you're the GM, after all-- you can do whatever you want. Here's a little secret: You don't [i]have[/i] to be [i]fair[/i]. Well, you do-- you need to be impartial, of course-- but it's OK if your monsters and villains can do things that your PCs can't. [i]The heroes' lot in life is to struggle against the odds.[/i] This is a rewarding gaming experience. Conan never cast a spell, and he ran up against countless supernatural foes. I never once heard him complain, "How come Thulsa Doom can do that and I can't?" I disagree. You've already mentioned action points and defense bonuses, which make a difference, but are not the main difference, in my opinion. The main advantage of a Modern/GT style character is [i]customization[/i]. When a GT character decides he wants to be good at something, he will be very, very good at it. A talent [i]within your specialty[/i] every 2nd level and a feat [i]within your specialty[/i] every other level, plus all the feats that a D&D character normally gets? You can pick and choose and min/max a very effective character. (I'm talking primarily now about non-spellcasters-- spellcasting changes things quite a bit.) For the most simple comparison, put a Fighter side by side with a Strong Hero. Same BAB. Same skill points. Both get a Feat of their choosing every 3rd character level. Fighter has slightly better HD (d10 vs d8). Fighter has slightly better Saves. Fighter gets a bonus feat every 2nd level. Strong hero gets a bonus feat every 2nd level. Here's where they diverge: The Strong hero gets a Talent every odd level! Being able to pick and choose the abilities you want to tweak out your character is very, very effective. Actually, I think the rogue is the hardest non-spellcasting class to keep pace with. Rogues enjoy a lot of class abilities that scale very quickly and can outpace a GT character. Unless the GT "rogue" is willing to forgo some of his abilities to specialize, I think the rogue will be more broadly useful. But you could... You won't break anything. If you want to use a published adventure, say, that includes an 8th level barbarian-- why exactly couldn't you just do it? There's nothing magical about the fact that he's called a barbarian (and not, for example, a Strong/Tough/Fast hero); at the end of the day he boils down to a bunch of numbers and mechanics, and you'll find those numbers and mechanics compatible with everything your Grim Tales PCs can do. No. Why? If action points were granted by a luckstone and defense was an unnamed bonus granted by an ioun stone, would that be [i]strange[/i]? First, let's separate spellcasting from spell-like abilities. There's no reason that creatures with spell-like abilities wouldn't carry on using them as they always have, side by side with characters who may or may not have spellcasting ability, be it D&D spellcasting or GT spellcasting. This disparity already exists even in standard D&D. Nobody ever asks why the efreeti can cast [i]wall of fire[/i] at will, but the PCs have to cast [i]wall of fire[/i] as a spell. If you're playing D&D and none of your players chooses to play a spellcaster, does that suddenly mean that all of your monsters have to suddenly forget how to use their spell-like abilities and spells? So if you can separate that in your mind, why can't you also allow spellcasting villains that can actually cast spells differently from your PCs? Why couldn't the villain be a sorcerer, or a wizard, learning and casting spells using knowledge that is unattainable by your PCs? (Think Thulsa Doom again, here...) Very easy: Just allow it. Game on! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Subtle Brilliance...
Top