Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Succubus Warlock with Familiar...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MostlyHarmless42" data-source="post: 7232841" data-attributes="member: 6845520"><p>First, this is a forum dedicated to running tabletop games, one heavily skewed towards munchkinry, powergaming, and fiddly bits, and is in no way indicative of the majority opinion of the players who play d&d. I wish to provide for him an opposing opinion as it is unlikely he will hear it otherwise. Perhaps I was a bit blanket statement in my phrasing, but I never said don't do it, merely that it was ill advised. The reason this is the case is not because it does not work, but because it causes a couple concerns. First, it tunnel visions the DM into a mindset of monster design that this monster *must* have 'x' ability because "that's what class y gets". This is bad because it stifles creativity. Why shouldn't my monster have second wind just because they aren't a fighter? Why would my ooze need multiple skill proficiencies just because I wanted to have sneak attack? It creates unnecessary bloat in the statblocks. </p><p></p><p>Second, and more important, giving a monster a class level adjusts all of the monsters stats, not just it's offense or defense, meaning when you stick to just adding class levels without properly tweaking the dials of the monster according to the charts like you should it can result in monsters which are wildly stronger or weaker than intended. It is the equivalent of using a sledgehammer for what could have often been better handled by adjusted with a screwdriver. I bring this up because the original poster seems like a newer DM (if this is inaccurate, forgive me), and I want to make sure he understands the implications of just tacking on class levels, particularly as not all classes are equal from a challenge rating perspective. It is not as simple as adding one CR per level added, as one can add far more levels of fighter without much concern, but the moment you give a creature the ability to cast wizard spells is a moment when they can now, fly, turn invisible, fireball, or summon other monsters, all things which drastically alter the fight dynamic and make the monster more difficult to run.</p><p></p><p>For the record, a good boss encounter should be a potential tpk. The key word is *potential*. Not every group has the same build or skillet in players. Another part of making a fun boss encounter is ensuring the boss actually survives past 1 round. For example, I'd sooner give the succubus legendary actions to attack, charm, or cast a warlock cantrip over a few levels of warlock any day, as it will make it far deadlier and more memorable. Legendary actions are also something adding class levels would never get you, while taking the fine tuning approach could. As is damage resistances, special senses, minions that a pc warlock could not gain, or using alternative hit dice for health. There's a reason, for example why the lich has d8 and damage resistances instead of the normal d6 of a wizard.</p><p></p><p>I also do agree that out of adding any classes, warlock is a good choice. They do make great villains, and their casting system is simpler. I also could accomplish the same by just giving them so many levels of casting like a warlock (based on the intended offensive CR I want), and a couple invocations that thematically make sense, just like how they did in Volos guide for the warlocks and literally every other non-adventure league monster.</p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>It sounds like to me if most of her interaction will be with the party through indirect means, you may consider using a Night Hag instead of a Succubus as the base monster, or alternatively giving the succubus the night hag dreams stuff (or the night hag charm) from their statblock, so she has a way to interact with the players through their dreams. Really mess with them and have fun. There is also another higher level spell that allows one to project an image of themselves to a location and interact with it, though I can't remember if warlocks get it offhand (see why I prefer to do the other route?). I like the idea conceptually though, and wish you luck. Definitely look into whatever final encounter you have with her either giving her legendary actions, minions (what self respecting succubus has no harem?), or both. I wish you luck. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MostlyHarmless42, post: 7232841, member: 6845520"] First, this is a forum dedicated to running tabletop games, one heavily skewed towards munchkinry, powergaming, and fiddly bits, and is in no way indicative of the majority opinion of the players who play d&d. I wish to provide for him an opposing opinion as it is unlikely he will hear it otherwise. Perhaps I was a bit blanket statement in my phrasing, but I never said don't do it, merely that it was ill advised. The reason this is the case is not because it does not work, but because it causes a couple concerns. First, it tunnel visions the DM into a mindset of monster design that this monster *must* have 'x' ability because "that's what class y gets". This is bad because it stifles creativity. Why shouldn't my monster have second wind just because they aren't a fighter? Why would my ooze need multiple skill proficiencies just because I wanted to have sneak attack? It creates unnecessary bloat in the statblocks. Second, and more important, giving a monster a class level adjusts all of the monsters stats, not just it's offense or defense, meaning when you stick to just adding class levels without properly tweaking the dials of the monster according to the charts like you should it can result in monsters which are wildly stronger or weaker than intended. It is the equivalent of using a sledgehammer for what could have often been better handled by adjusted with a screwdriver. I bring this up because the original poster seems like a newer DM (if this is inaccurate, forgive me), and I want to make sure he understands the implications of just tacking on class levels, particularly as not all classes are equal from a challenge rating perspective. It is not as simple as adding one CR per level added, as one can add far more levels of fighter without much concern, but the moment you give a creature the ability to cast wizard spells is a moment when they can now, fly, turn invisible, fireball, or summon other monsters, all things which drastically alter the fight dynamic and make the monster more difficult to run. For the record, a good boss encounter should be a potential tpk. The key word is *potential*. Not every group has the same build or skillet in players. Another part of making a fun boss encounter is ensuring the boss actually survives past 1 round. For example, I'd sooner give the succubus legendary actions to attack, charm, or cast a warlock cantrip over a few levels of warlock any day, as it will make it far deadlier and more memorable. Legendary actions are also something adding class levels would never get you, while taking the fine tuning approach could. As is damage resistances, special senses, minions that a pc warlock could not gain, or using alternative hit dice for health. There's a reason, for example why the lich has d8 and damage resistances instead of the normal d6 of a wizard. I also do agree that out of adding any classes, warlock is a good choice. They do make great villains, and their casting system is simpler. I also could accomplish the same by just giving them so many levels of casting like a warlock (based on the intended offensive CR I want), and a couple invocations that thematically make sense, just like how they did in Volos guide for the warlocks and literally every other non-adventure league monster. . It sounds like to me if most of her interaction will be with the party through indirect means, you may consider using a Night Hag instead of a Succubus as the base monster, or alternatively giving the succubus the night hag dreams stuff (or the night hag charm) from their statblock, so she has a way to interact with the players through their dreams. Really mess with them and have fun. There is also another higher level spell that allows one to project an image of themselves to a location and interact with it, though I can't remember if warlocks get it offhand (see why I prefer to do the other route?). I like the idea conceptually though, and wish you luck. Definitely look into whatever final encounter you have with her either giving her legendary actions, minions (what self respecting succubus has no harem?), or both. I wish you luck. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Succubus Warlock with Familiar...
Top