Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Laurefindel" data-source="post: 7541711" data-attributes="member: 67296">ThisI too much prefer to give (and to receive) a “yes, but have you considered...” answer over a “pfff, no.”I don’t come to these boards to be told I’m right. When I come to these boards, it’s because I have a doubt, or because I’m looking for side-effects [houserule] would have and that I haven’t think of.But the last thing I’m coming here for is to be told that I play the game wrong. I don’t mind being told that I wrongly apply the rules, but people often fail to make the distinction.Telling someone that their anecdotal experience is skewed by taking the time to explain why and offering one or two avenues to explore before houseruling is helpful. Being told that your perceived issue simply doesn’t exist isn’t.As for the OP, I would consider giving the +5 bonus to AC against the initial attack only, or make it a “concentration up to your next turn” spell with a clause that also allows the spell to be cast as a spontaneous effect as a reaction.</blockquote>