Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Suggestion for compromise on Wizard's PDFs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 4950742" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>Can anybody? It created an important test for future cases. The deciding factor there seems to be that Grokster was marketed in such a way as to promote infringement, rather than for its legitimate uses. You can slice a grain of rice with a precedent that narrow. Very interesting stuff.</p><p></p><p>I may not be a second year law student, but I will tel you this - Second year law students are probably the worst people to ask about the future of IP law. A little knowledge, as they say, is a dangerous thing. IANAL, but this topic in particular is of importance to me, and I can tell you right now that anyone who thinks copyright law for the 21st century has been settled is fooling themselves. </p><p></p><p>This is the basis for copyright law:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So the real test for any copyright law is not simply whether it secures the righs of the author, but that by doing so their endeavors are made available to the public. Certainly, the rights of the author do not extend as far as dictating how a person enjoys a particular work. Deciding cases on which files are made into electronic backups and so forth requires a balancing of concerns. </p><p></p><p>So in my view, removing PDFs of out of print games, specifically to make them unavailable, invalidates the constitutional basis for copyright and hence the case for infringment. While a commercial purpose does not have to be established, it must be shown that an author's right to benefit from a work has been infringed. Removing PDFs from availability simply to avoid paying for site maintenance is not a use reserved to the author, but simply a practical decision. The case for infringement would probably have to establish that the files had some potential value other than being distributed for free that outweighs the public benefit of access to historically and academically and recreationally valuable vintage gaming products.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 4950742, member: 15538"] Can anybody? It created an important test for future cases. The deciding factor there seems to be that Grokster was marketed in such a way as to promote infringement, rather than for its legitimate uses. You can slice a grain of rice with a precedent that narrow. Very interesting stuff. I may not be a second year law student, but I will tel you this - Second year law students are probably the worst people to ask about the future of IP law. A little knowledge, as they say, is a dangerous thing. IANAL, but this topic in particular is of importance to me, and I can tell you right now that anyone who thinks copyright law for the 21st century has been settled is fooling themselves. This is the basis for copyright law: So the real test for any copyright law is not simply whether it secures the righs of the author, but that by doing so their endeavors are made available to the public. Certainly, the rights of the author do not extend as far as dictating how a person enjoys a particular work. Deciding cases on which files are made into electronic backups and so forth requires a balancing of concerns. So in my view, removing PDFs of out of print games, specifically to make them unavailable, invalidates the constitutional basis for copyright and hence the case for infringment. While a commercial purpose does not have to be established, it must be shown that an author's right to benefit from a work has been infringed. Removing PDFs from availability simply to avoid paying for site maintenance is not a use reserved to the author, but simply a practical decision. The case for infringement would probably have to establish that the files had some potential value other than being distributed for free that outweighs the public benefit of access to historically and academically and recreationally valuable vintage gaming products. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Suggestion for compromise on Wizard's PDFs
Top