Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="abri" data-source="post: 637970" data-attributes="member: 1080">Well, I'll have to disagree.The main problem with the phb SM is:1) The duration is too short.2)Not enough choice.I really like the new dragons rules (PS:if you use all of them):a) Many creatures for each SMb) Each spellcaster only has access to 3 (or more if he researches) type of creature per SMc) Creature have to be OKed by the DMd) creatures with real spell-abilities count as CR+1, CR+2 or more.One thing I really think should be added though, is a change in duration: 3+LV round seems to work fine in the 3 campaign I'm in.With all these, the SM seems right.Aasimar for SMI, are nice for L1 spell: basically you get something that is not as powerfull as a L1 fighter but not too far for a few rounds.To be honnest I still find that SM becomes MUCH more efficient after you are LV3.Ps: In the campaign I'm a player instead of DM, we use the fuel spell feats from Treasure and lair and that really take care of the duration problem.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>