Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="IceBear" data-source="post: 376492" data-attributes="member: 1118">Well, I guess we have a differing opinion on the sunder rule then <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  It might be a little too easy (ie unrealistic) but it is plausible.I said I like parts of your house rule, but I find it even more unrealistic that I can't stand beside someone with a longbow and I can chop it to pieces without him trying to shoot me with it.  Or I can't try to split his shield unless he tries to bash me with it. That's what I don't like.  As I said before, maybe I misunderstand your house rule as written (I am stupid) so if you can address how your rule would handle that I might come on board.Here's what I understand your rule as being - If you ready an action then when someone attacks you with a weapon you can attempt to sunder it with an AoO (why an AoO and not the readied action).  Where I have an issue is with how to sunder something that no one attacks you with.  I see lots of people saying that archers are too strong, so if you're forcing people to spend two rounds (one to get close enough and a second to use a readied action) in order to sunder the bow then I don't like it.IceBear</blockquote>