Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kerleth" data-source="post: 6570541" data-attributes="member: 84383">My group made a couple of go's at 3rd edition's The World's Largest Dungeon (great read and map rescource, horrible adventure to play through from my experience). At one point we used savage species "monster levels" + unearthed arcana gestalt rules. I was a vampire ogre. Somebody else was a paragon illithid. A different party was composed of a mohrg, a cleric of tharizdun, a necrocarnate, and.... I can't remember the last one. He may have been a telepathic ice cream cone (joking, but only on the last one). We ran parts of the adventure a few times, it was tedious but we were stubborn, so we ran the gamut from serious parties to WTHOMGBBQ.As an aside These sorts of responses blow me away. It is possible to challenge characters who are not humanoids. Heck, it's possible to challenge characters who are invincible, for that matter. Comparing playing an odd character concept to being all powerful is ridiculous. If you don't like the flavor, fine. If the character would ruin the theme and feel of a game, also fine. But jumping down the slippery slope fallacy with both feet, hands tied behind your back, eyes glued shut,...well you get the idea. Bad form. In all fairness that claim is part of a much smaller post, and I have no disagreement with the "it's all subjective" point being made in the rest of it. Just addressing this one point.</blockquote>