Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Superior Training
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="77IM" data-source="post: 4651072" data-attributes="member: 12377"><p>I have been thinking about superior weapons lately, and how they are kind of broken, since they obsolete military weapons. What I mean is, if you are playing a melee character, there's almost no reason not to spend the feat and get a superior weapon. For example, the bastard sword is better than both the longsword and the greatsword -- there's no reason to use either of those when bastard sword is just a feat away (or if you definitely want to be a 2-hander, get fullblade, that thing rocks). Sure, you could stick with the inferior weapon and pile on feats, like Weapon Focus, but the superior weapon's damage increase stacks with all of that. Sure, superior weapons cost a feat, but feats are relatively cheap, and considering [W] multipliers, getting a superior weapon is well worth it. The problem is even worse comparing superior weapons to simple weapons.</p><p></p><p>The problem is that some players may want to wield inferior weapons for role-playing reasons. For example, a follower of the Raven Queen who wants to carry a scythe, or a sword-and-board fighter who likes the look of the longsword and can't picture their character holding something as redonkulously long as a bastard sword. Of course one easy solution is to just reskin existing items -- get an execution axe and just call it a scythe. I find this vaguely unsatisfactory, though, because the match-up is rarely perfect and because it still puts the focus on the item rather than the character.</p><p></p><p>So I invented a feat. The goal is to make military and simple weapons competitive with superior weapons, while keeping them mechanically different, and for the same cost (1 feat).</p><p></p><p>Heroic Tier Feat:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>SUPERIOR TRAINING</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Benefit:</strong> Choose a specific military or simple weapon with which you are proficient. You get a +1 feat bonus to attack rolls with such weapons. If it's a simple weapon, the weapon die increases by one size when you wield it.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>Special:</strong> You can take this feat more than once. Each time you select this feat, choose another weapon.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What to you guys think: Is a +1 attack bonus overpowered?</p><p></p><p> -- 77IM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="77IM, post: 4651072, member: 12377"] I have been thinking about superior weapons lately, and how they are kind of broken, since they obsolete military weapons. What I mean is, if you are playing a melee character, there's almost no reason not to spend the feat and get a superior weapon. For example, the bastard sword is better than both the longsword and the greatsword -- there's no reason to use either of those when bastard sword is just a feat away (or if you definitely want to be a 2-hander, get fullblade, that thing rocks). Sure, you could stick with the inferior weapon and pile on feats, like Weapon Focus, but the superior weapon's damage increase stacks with all of that. Sure, superior weapons cost a feat, but feats are relatively cheap, and considering [W] multipliers, getting a superior weapon is well worth it. The problem is even worse comparing superior weapons to simple weapons. The problem is that some players may want to wield inferior weapons for role-playing reasons. For example, a follower of the Raven Queen who wants to carry a scythe, or a sword-and-board fighter who likes the look of the longsword and can't picture their character holding something as redonkulously long as a bastard sword. Of course one easy solution is to just reskin existing items -- get an execution axe and just call it a scythe. I find this vaguely unsatisfactory, though, because the match-up is rarely perfect and because it still puts the focus on the item rather than the character. So I invented a feat. The goal is to make military and simple weapons competitive with superior weapons, while keeping them mechanically different, and for the same cost (1 feat). Heroic Tier Feat: [INDENT][B]SUPERIOR TRAINING[/B] [B]Benefit:[/B] Choose a specific military or simple weapon with which you are proficient. You get a +1 feat bonus to attack rolls with such weapons. If it's a simple weapon, the weapon die increases by one size when you wield it. [B]Special:[/B] You can take this feat more than once. Each time you select this feat, choose another weapon.[/INDENT] What to you guys think: Is a +1 attack bonus overpowered? -- 77IM [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Superior Training
Top