Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 6399609" data-attributes="member: 957">I realize that you are not speaking at me, there are several people commenting here.  For sake of response, I'll pretend you were.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />As I pointed out, finding agreement can be a great thing.  But for BOTH the players and the DM, simply recognizing that one or the other should walk away is the best option.  "Compromise" is not magic bullet.  If compromise will make Player A a little more happy and make the other four people at the table a little less happy, then screw Player A.  Go Away.  ThanksAnd, again, Player A should be HAPPY to avoid the frustration.    If Player A can't find another game, it isn't the fault of anyone else.  It is easy to accept that sometimes there is no compromise.  Some people also need to accept that sometime a lack of compromise is for the best.If a player's best and final offer is not acceptable.  That player is just as much to blame as anyone else and everyone is better off going their separate ways.If the whole group doesn't think the DM is putting on a game that justifies the table requirements, then the table goes away.  It works both ways.</blockquote>