Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Supplemental books: Why the compulsion to buy and use, but complain about it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardcoreDandDGirl" data-source="post: 6401203" data-attributes="member: 82746"><p>your race restriction really come off as "my way or high way" because if someone really wanted to play X you cant' consive of a reason to let them...</p><p></p><p></p><p>then the answer to the question of "What do you say when someone wants to play a dragonborn" is "Oh, then I would have made my world fit dragonborn, but none of us are using the race anyway"</p><p></p><p>it depends, sometimes it sounds fine... maybe we all really wanted to play elves and dwarves... then it would be "cool, sounds like fun." but if someone had spent the last few months really wanting to play a tiefling warlock then they might say "Man I really had my heart set on tiefling warlock" and then that would dove tail into a whole discussion.</p><p></p><p> </p><p>I agree, the important things to me are friends, story, and character. the story and character can fit 99% of games and worlds...</p><p></p><p></p><p>I do to, inless the DM does something to breach that trust...</p><p></p><p></p><p>see 100% on the same page here... that is like a perfect description of my play style</p><p></p><p> 100% agree here too... it's amazing we have so much in common but can be at odds so much...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>so just to be clear, you have no problem discussing things... when you are a player, so how is that different then discussing someone playing a dragonborn?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you wanted to play those it would have come up at setting discussion, aka I don't want to play a hafling in Dragonlance, because I don't want to play in dragonlance if I want to play a hafling...</p><p></p><p>Then they are a bad player and need to be beat... with a stick... no matter the setting...</p><p></p><p></p><p>yes, but if the players don't want to play it, they should either a back burner it till the do, or modfie it until they do... not force people to play something they don't want to</p><p></p><p> look at [MENTION=67338]GMforPowergamers[/MENTION], he is going to allow a rune priest is Athus. or look to my own DM who let warlocks run around Greyhawk...</p><p> </p><p></p><p>well not really directed at me, I will just say in a Forgotten Realms game a few years back that happened... I just said "well if you want to play the rules of warforged and the fluff of being a 1 off awakened construct that would be great." and the player ran with it for months.</p><p></p><p> I have seen both (although mostly the propose first) but my problem is when in that propose step, before the game starts, when just talking about creation of characters, not even dice out yet, the PC says "I don't like x restriction" isn't that the perfect time to talk it through?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardcoreDandDGirl, post: 6401203, member: 82746"] your race restriction really come off as "my way or high way" because if someone really wanted to play X you cant' consive of a reason to let them... then the answer to the question of "What do you say when someone wants to play a dragonborn" is "Oh, then I would have made my world fit dragonborn, but none of us are using the race anyway" it depends, sometimes it sounds fine... maybe we all really wanted to play elves and dwarves... then it would be "cool, sounds like fun." but if someone had spent the last few months really wanting to play a tiefling warlock then they might say "Man I really had my heart set on tiefling warlock" and then that would dove tail into a whole discussion. I agree, the important things to me are friends, story, and character. the story and character can fit 99% of games and worlds... I do to, inless the DM does something to breach that trust... see 100% on the same page here... that is like a perfect description of my play style 100% agree here too... it's amazing we have so much in common but can be at odds so much... so just to be clear, you have no problem discussing things... when you are a player, so how is that different then discussing someone playing a dragonborn? If you wanted to play those it would have come up at setting discussion, aka I don't want to play a hafling in Dragonlance, because I don't want to play in dragonlance if I want to play a hafling... Then they are a bad player and need to be beat... with a stick... no matter the setting... yes, but if the players don't want to play it, they should either a back burner it till the do, or modfie it until they do... not force people to play something they don't want to look at [MENTION=67338]GMforPowergamers[/MENTION], he is going to allow a rune priest is Athus. or look to my own DM who let warlocks run around Greyhawk... well not really directed at me, I will just say in a Forgotten Realms game a few years back that happened... I just said "well if you want to play the rules of warforged and the fluff of being a 1 off awakened construct that would be great." and the player ran with it for months. I have seen both (although mostly the propose first) but my problem is when in that propose step, before the game starts, when just talking about creation of characters, not even dice out yet, the PC says "I don't like x restriction" isn't that the perfect time to talk it through? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Supplemental books: Why the compulsion to buy and use, but complain about it?
Top