Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Supplemental books: Why the compulsion to buy and use, but complain about it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Piratecat" data-source="post: 6404213" data-attributes="member: 2"><p>Again: allowing new mechanics, or not allowing them, can have <em>nothing</em> to do with trust in the players. Nothing. And I put the word in italics and everything, so you know I must be serious. </p><p></p><p>My watchword when dealing with player requests: is it fair? Is it fun?</p><p></p><p>An easy example: I love plenty of games with guns in them, but I detest gunpowder in D&D. I don't want to mix my D&D and my firearms because I don't like the feel. Such games aren't fun for me. If Sagiro, one of my best friends and a superb DM in his own right, asked to play a gunslinger I'd say no. It has nothing to do with trust or character balance—I trust him implicitly in all aspects of gaming and real life—but gunpowder doesn't doesn't fit in my world, so the answer is no. </p><p></p><p>Hussar, you keep conflating the two, implying that a DM using good sense is somehow betraying her players' right to unlimited choice. That right doesn't and (in my opinion) shouldn't exist. </p><p></p><p>Interestingly, in my above example, I might work with the player to reskin the gunslinger as a magical wand-wielder, assuming it was the mechanics and not the flavor they liked. I'd find that fun. But I reserve the right to reject rules based on mechanics as well, especially if those rules aren't fair to me or the other players. Designers in Renton don't know what works wonderfully in my game as well as my players and I do. I remember way back in 2nd edition when a player tried to talk me into letting his race be "polymorphed young silver dragon." That'd probably be fun, but it wouldn't have been fair to the other players. I declined, and he happily picked a human. </p><p></p><p>My take? If you don't like a DM's gaming style or campaign, it's fine if you choose not to play with them. Same thing for a DM choosing not to include a player who's a bad match. But a single player doesn't get to unilaterally force feed their wishes on the rest of the group. That's neither fair or fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Piratecat, post: 6404213, member: 2"] Again: allowing new mechanics, or not allowing them, can have [i]nothing[/i] to do with trust in the players. Nothing. And I put the word in italics and everything, so you know I must be serious. My watchword when dealing with player requests: is it fair? Is it fun? An easy example: I love plenty of games with guns in them, but I detest gunpowder in D&D. I don't want to mix my D&D and my firearms because I don't like the feel. Such games aren't fun for me. If Sagiro, one of my best friends and a superb DM in his own right, asked to play a gunslinger I'd say no. It has nothing to do with trust or character balance—I trust him implicitly in all aspects of gaming and real life—but gunpowder doesn't doesn't fit in my world, so the answer is no. Hussar, you keep conflating the two, implying that a DM using good sense is somehow betraying her players' right to unlimited choice. That right doesn't and (in my opinion) shouldn't exist. Interestingly, in my above example, I might work with the player to reskin the gunslinger as a magical wand-wielder, assuming it was the mechanics and not the flavor they liked. I'd find that fun. But I reserve the right to reject rules based on mechanics as well, especially if those rules aren't fair to me or the other players. Designers in Renton don't know what works wonderfully in my game as well as my players and I do. I remember way back in 2nd edition when a player tried to talk me into letting his race be "polymorphed young silver dragon." That'd probably be fun, but it wouldn't have been fair to the other players. I declined, and he happily picked a human. My take? If you don't like a DM's gaming style or campaign, it's fine if you choose not to play with them. Same thing for a DM choosing not to include a player who's a bad match. But a single player doesn't get to unilaterally force feed their wishes on the rest of the group. That's neither fair or fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Supplemental books: Why the compulsion to buy and use, but complain about it?
Top