Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 8648505" data-attributes="member: 6696971">[USER=71699]@clearstream[/USER] I’m just working off of your conversation with [USER=70468]@kenada[/USER] in posts 1966 and 1967 above with the ranger and the mountain and the dragon.Your situation you’ve depicted above has a Ranger. It has a mountain. It has a Dragon.The Ranger tries to recall specific lore about historical events and legends (the same way it’s done in any game) by saying some words to the table/GM.How does that matter get settled/resolved?Alternatively, if they want to look for a Treant (that are wise and old by default so it’s unclear why that became a point of contention?) in the forest below the mountain’s tree-line, how does the matter of “a Treant exists/does not exist in these forested mountains” get settled/resolved?If they do find a Treant, how does “does this Treant recall specific lore about historical events/legends sufficient to resolve the Ranger’s pondering” get resolved?The answer to these questions are quite relevant to the thread. There is a Gamism approach to resolve these matters. There is a Simulationism approach to resolve these matters. There is a Story Now approach to resolve these matters.They all diverge significantly.</blockquote>