Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 8651559" data-attributes="member: 71699">I'm trying to make it clear that it's not Story-Now, and it's not "GM-fiat" (in the way some here have described it) either. I'm fine with those two diagrams, and the play I enjoy isn't captured by either of them. The whole of RPG isn't defined by just two diagrams.I'm not discussing shame. I'm aiming to make clear a style of play. One in which players do not have fiat, and GM does not have fiat. It's unclear why it is so difficult to see that - as the LP implies - a robust playstyle can be found in an interative process that reaches consensus at the point of and productive of well-formed/faithful intents.Certainly. Is there anywhere - any words that I've written - that seem to you to amount to my saying that exploratory play isn't fun?</blockquote>