Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sure strike sneaky fixes or not.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Garthanos" data-source="post: 4882827" data-attributes="member: 82504"><p>Over conditional usefulness in an at-will is far worse than in an feat... </p><p>because the at-will is a smaller more precious resource and has to be compared directly to another at-will which provides similar benefits preferabley.. and to me reaping strike does indeed provide similar benefits (except against minions)</p><p>For me as a DM frequency of usefulness is significant if somebody spams me with one at will because the other is only "maybe" slightly useful 1 in 5 encounters that is an argument against that at-will. I cant say it compares worth beans for <strong>average damage dealing</strong> - <strong>maximum possible damge</strong> or <strong>reliability of that damage</strong> does even for his BRV fighter... versus a reaping strike done by the same fighter presented by DS see below.... </p><p></p><p>An Example .. </p><p>ok lets say he fights an elite skeleton captain ac 20 that is a higher armor class on a level 3 enemy and pretty good deal better than the 18 quoted earlier.</p><p></p><p>Since he is fighting somebody higher level the odds of dwarf fighter having his brv hitpoints shrunk considerably since BRV has been nerfed but lets look with and without it </p><p></p><p>His chance to hit with a +5 attack he has to roll a 15 or better to hit that means 30 percent or 40 percent with sure strike.</p><p></p><p>the reaping strike does 2d6+2+3 damage on a hit and 3 on a miss...</p><p>3.6 + 2.1 or 5.7 damage average</p><p></p><p>and lets give 2d6+2 damage on a hit with a sure strike... well that is </p><p>3.6 + 0 or 3.6 damage.... oops.. bad sign there... its still outclassed</p><p></p><p>next round he does get his BRV damage boost... the crazy axemen gets </p><p>the damage becomes 4.4 ... doesnt compare vary well to reaping strike no not at all and that is an adversary with 20 AC.... more than a little better than the 18 quoted lets pick a higher yet adversary say </p><p></p><p>hmm his damages he quoted were 15 and 12 I have 14(12) and 11(9) I must have missed a point ( did he have a weapon focus feat I wasnt aware of?... the BRV is far from garanteed these days.</p><p></p><p>Lets pick a level 5 hobgoblin war chief shall we awesome 22 AC .... </p><p>wow to hit a 22 his poor dice will have to really dig deap a roll of 17 hits right that is 20 percent now the sure strike surely will shine better than a reaping strike.</p><p></p><p>reaping strike is now averaging 4.8 damage...sans brv bonus damage</p><p></p><p>but lets see... .3 x 9 is 2.7 and even 11 is 3.3 if </p><p></p><p>If your DM likes a lot of minions(they rock gotta love em) well that also provides very definite circumstances for using sure strike(cleave can lower its hand yes I know you can knock out two at one blow).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Garthanos, post: 4882827, member: 82504"] Over conditional usefulness in an at-will is far worse than in an feat... because the at-will is a smaller more precious resource and has to be compared directly to another at-will which provides similar benefits preferabley.. and to me reaping strike does indeed provide similar benefits (except against minions) For me as a DM frequency of usefulness is significant if somebody spams me with one at will because the other is only "maybe" slightly useful 1 in 5 encounters that is an argument against that at-will. I cant say it compares worth beans for [B]average damage dealing[/B] - [B]maximum possible damge[/B] or [B]reliability of that damage[/B] does even for his BRV fighter... versus a reaping strike done by the same fighter presented by DS see below.... An Example .. ok lets say he fights an elite skeleton captain ac 20 that is a higher armor class on a level 3 enemy and pretty good deal better than the 18 quoted earlier. Since he is fighting somebody higher level the odds of dwarf fighter having his brv hitpoints shrunk considerably since BRV has been nerfed but lets look with and without it His chance to hit with a +5 attack he has to roll a 15 or better to hit that means 30 percent or 40 percent with sure strike. the reaping strike does 2d6+2+3 damage on a hit and 3 on a miss... 3.6 + 2.1 or 5.7 damage average and lets give 2d6+2 damage on a hit with a sure strike... well that is 3.6 + 0 or 3.6 damage.... oops.. bad sign there... its still outclassed next round he does get his BRV damage boost... the crazy axemen gets the damage becomes 4.4 ... doesnt compare vary well to reaping strike no not at all and that is an adversary with 20 AC.... more than a little better than the 18 quoted lets pick a higher yet adversary say hmm his damages he quoted were 15 and 12 I have 14(12) and 11(9) I must have missed a point ( did he have a weapon focus feat I wasnt aware of?... the BRV is far from garanteed these days. Lets pick a level 5 hobgoblin war chief shall we awesome 22 AC .... wow to hit a 22 his poor dice will have to really dig deap a roll of 17 hits right that is 20 percent now the sure strike surely will shine better than a reaping strike. reaping strike is now averaging 4.8 damage...sans brv bonus damage but lets see... .3 x 9 is 2.7 and even 11 is 3.3 if If your DM likes a lot of minions(they rock gotta love em) well that also provides very definite circumstances for using sure strike(cleave can lower its hand yes I know you can knock out two at one blow). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sure strike sneaky fixes or not.
Top