Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Surprise or no surprise?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ridley's Cohort" data-source="post: 2223672" data-attributes="member: 545"><p>I would put it another way.</p><p></p><p>My reading of the RAW is that the Spectre is aware. Whether the party is aware, or even the golems are aware is wide open to interpretation.</p><p></p><p>Yes, the golems' status is ambiguous because we have the can of worms whether X telling Y makes Y aware. What if X's information is incorrect? What if X is lying but the lie turns out to be true? What if X's information is very vague?</p><p></p><p>If say so without precise & accurate details is sufficient ("Hey golems, someone is coming.") then that suggests that the party's information still counts. Is there an expiration date on completely accurate information?</p><p></p><p>What if the party cleric used Detect Evil and the spectre popped up on the radar? Does that constitute awareness? To the whole party if they are informed? Again, what if information is misleading? What if the informer purposefully misleads? (BTW I do see this last one in actual play when a PC with a monopoly on a source of information wants to push the party into a certain direction.)</p><p></p><p>The RAW does not say.</p><p></p><p>My position is that the RAW works in limited situations but not in others, and that one is better off ditching the RAW and starting over. Use the RAW for inspiration.</p><p></p><p></p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>As an aside to the main thrust of my argument...</p><p></p><p>I would further add that the suggestion that spectre and golems could have moved in 5 weeks a bit odd. Theorectically, yes. But in your vanilla kick-in-the-door dungeon crawl the undead and constructs have been there 100 years. And they will still be there in a 100 years if the PCs do not take them out. </p><p></p><p>If repositioning was practical, why didn't the spectre and golems move?</p><p></p><p>If the spectre was not being handed a gimme by the DM, it would be apparent that either the spectre could not move, or that it has the strategic initiative of the average garden slug.</p><p></p><p>Why not just have a golem open the door and attack the PCs while they are clustered in the hall? The main reason not too is if sitting on your hands and waiting for the party to get themselves surprised were a practical strategy.</p><p></p><p>(Please do not take this as a criticism of Space Coyote himself. He is clearly being a very conscientious DM. I just happen to disagree with his particular ruling on this matter.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ridley's Cohort, post: 2223672, member: 545"] I would put it another way. My reading of the RAW is that the Spectre is aware. Whether the party is aware, or even the golems are aware is wide open to interpretation. Yes, the golems' status is ambiguous because we have the can of worms whether X telling Y makes Y aware. What if X's information is incorrect? What if X is lying but the lie turns out to be true? What if X's information is very vague? If say so without precise & accurate details is sufficient ("Hey golems, someone is coming.") then that suggests that the party's information still counts. Is there an expiration date on completely accurate information? What if the party cleric used Detect Evil and the spectre popped up on the radar? Does that constitute awareness? To the whole party if they are informed? Again, what if information is misleading? What if the informer purposefully misleads? (BTW I do see this last one in actual play when a PC with a monopoly on a source of information wants to push the party into a certain direction.) The RAW does not say. My position is that the RAW works in limited situations but not in others, and that one is better off ditching the RAW and starting over. Use the RAW for inspiration. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ As an aside to the main thrust of my argument... I would further add that the suggestion that spectre and golems could have moved in 5 weeks a bit odd. Theorectically, yes. But in your vanilla kick-in-the-door dungeon crawl the undead and constructs have been there 100 years. And they will still be there in a 100 years if the PCs do not take them out. If repositioning was practical, why didn't the spectre and golems move? If the spectre was not being handed a gimme by the DM, it would be apparent that either the spectre could not move, or that it has the strategic initiative of the average garden slug. Why not just have a golem open the door and attack the PCs while they are clustered in the hall? The main reason not too is if sitting on your hands and waiting for the party to get themselves surprised were a practical strategy. (Please do not take this as a criticism of Space Coyote himself. He is clearly being a very conscientious DM. I just happen to disagree with his particular ruling on this matter.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Surprise or no surprise?
Top