Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="N0Man" data-source="post: 4837851" data-attributes="member: 64066">As I said earlier, it was a poor word choice.&nbsp; I was tired, and there had been a small number of statements made during this discussion that I felt either misunderstood , misconstrued, or mocked my viewpoint, and that me feel a tad more defensive than usual.Looking back, I did say initially I thought it was evil, during the initial shock of hearing that this was as common place as it was.&nbsp; I think I even may have unintentionally wavered on the keyword &quot;evil&quot;.However, during the discussion I began to avoid describing it as evil (universally) and tried to present my opinion that it is *generally* evil (but varying greatly by campaign/setting/scenario).&nbsp; I did on at least one point concede that it din't have to be &quot;evil&quot;, but maintained that it was chaotic, non-heroic, and possibly metagaming.You misunderstanding me was probably a combination of my viewpoint shifting slightly through the course of the discussion and me doing a poor job of expressing myself.&nbsp; I apologize if I came off as implying that any misunderstanding was deliberate on your part.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="N0Man, post: 4837851, member: 64066"] As I said earlier, it was a poor word choice. I was tired, and there had been a small number of statements made during this discussion that I felt either misunderstood , misconstrued, or mocked my viewpoint, and that me feel a tad more defensive than usual. Looking back, I did say initially I thought it was evil, during the initial shock of hearing that this was as common place as it was. I think I even may have unintentionally wavered on the keyword "evil". However, during the discussion I began to avoid describing it as evil (universally) and tried to present my opinion that it is *generally* evil (but varying greatly by campaign/setting/scenario). I did on at least one point concede that it din't have to be "evil", but maintained that it was chaotic, non-heroic, and possibly metagaming. You misunderstanding me was probably a combination of my viewpoint shifting slightly through the course of the discussion and me doing a poor job of expressing myself. I apologize if I came off as implying that any misunderstanding was deliberate on your part. [/QUOTE]

Verification