Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Indaarys" data-source="post: 9025776" data-attributes="member: 7040941">I don't blame the GM for the rule being what it is, I blame the GM for doing nothing to address it and then acting like its anyones fault but their own if the game doesn't work. Because 5e already exists and isn't being updated. If you want to play 5e, you need to deal with its issues or stop complaining when the game, that you're running of your own free will, doesn't stack up. This, again, is why I said you're crossing the streams. The train of thought on the unclear/incompleteness of the flight rules and how they should be written is a different train of thought from what a GM should be doing when confronted with such a rule in an already published game.Now continue the thought and address the actual point rather than just the hyperbole. Where did I say this?As said, if you're designing encounters properly you don't need to go out of your way or do anything differently in the first place. In other words, stop designing identically blank white rooms. If all your encounters have to be changed because a flying race is present, that directly says all of your encounters are way too samey in some aspect.</blockquote>