Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 6709378" data-attributes="member: 29398">Voted Barbarian, because all along it should have been a sub-RACE of Human with a magic-hating background and not a class at all.  Dumb stupid idea.If I could have voted again, Warlock would be next - what the hell is a Warlock anyway?After that, Sorcerer - so that Wizards can steal their (non-)memorization mechanics from their rotting corpses - and Bard, which just doesn't work right and never really has.And while I don't like Paladins as they are I do think there's lots of room in the game for a Knight-like class, so I'd rather see them rebuilt into Cavaliers than removed entirely.  See below for what becomes of their holy side...Rogue should be renamed back to Thief, but kept.And to fill the holes created by removing the classes noted above, I propose Illusionist, Necromancer, and War Cleric (taking in the Paladin's holy bits but open to all alignments).Lan-"Friar Tuck is a CLERIC.  So much so, in fact, that he's always been my go-to example whenever someone asks me what a D&D Cleric is all about"-efan</blockquote>