Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sugarmouse" data-source="post: 2428474" data-attributes="member: 20455">I should explain a little more, Coredump.The exotic dancer was in no immediate danger, however the cries of help were coming from a burning building.My comment in regards to him standing a chance was in the face of his choice of rescuing the dancer/sith, and was perhaps poorly written into the context.It was a landspeeder - and it wasn't his. Technically it did belong to the Hutt, however, it was the only intact vehicle around. He ordered the killing almost immediately, not trying to pursue other options, like sharing. Regardless.It was his *character* saying it. For us, once you are at the table, what you say is what *you* say. Considering that text is a poor way of qualifying the intent with which he said it, the first DSP was justified (he agreed, and he is our primary SWGM), and so did the second when he ignored a blatant warning from the Force (me) and continued on with his course of anger. And he did have us all in stitches.Giving in to his anger is a major transgression IMHO.If you still consider this insufficient then: Different strokes for different folks.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>