Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gribble" data-source="post: 3538500" data-attributes="member: 12430">I can see where you're coming from, and I tend to agree, it's just that the static DC always seemed a bit... off... to me. Why should it be just as easy to get around a big slow lumbering giant as it is to get around, e.g.: a high-dex jedi weapon master?While 3.5 D&D went some way to making it *better*, it's still essentially just a static DC which doesn't take the speed/reflexes of your opponent into account.Well, I was kind of hoping for something official in the core rulebook, but this is a nice compromise. The only problem I see with SWSE is that in most cases your acrobatic (tumble) skill modifier is likely to be *lower* than your reflex defence, which makes this tactic kind of suboptimal...Maybe treat your tumble check result as a one off bonus to your reflex defence? If you roll a result of 15+, thats very likely to make you unhittable anyway...Of make the DC of the tumble check the reflex defence of your opponent? For most mooks (non-heroics) that will be somewhere between 10 & 15 anyway (making it slightly easier to get around mooks), and for classed opponents it'll be higher... actually, I kind of like that.Though I guess I should wait and see if they have tweaked the rules at all, before I start houseruling! Maybe there will be something in there that takes my issues into account.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

Verification