Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sweeney Todd
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackrat" data-source="post: 4111504" data-attributes="member: 27761"><p>So I saw this on weekend and decided to give a review. Now I could ofcourse go the way of my little Toreador friend with whom I saw it, and say: OMG OMG it was done by Tim Burton so it is so cool like you know, because all Tim Burton does is like awesome because it's done by Tim Burton, and no matter what I'll never admit that there was anything bad to say. (Yeah, I had to listen to that for fifteen minutes after the movie). But instead I'll try to do a little less biased review. Don't get me wrong, I did in fact enjoy the movie, it's just that lots of vision don't make up for lack of plot and too much meaningful staring.</p><p></p><p>Let's see:</p><p>Visually: Very beautiful movie in the macabre way I enjoy. Now how couldn't it be, it had many beautiful actors. The mood was well implanted to dark victorian London and costume desing was done to emphasis that. The blood (which was plenty) was tacky as always in these kinds of movies but oddly it fit well here. I rather suspect that it was intentionally made to look too bright. Mr Depp has a good voice and although he isn't a singer he has a knack for that. Same can't be said for all the actors. There was some amount of poor singing, a little more good singing and quite a lot of mediocre singing. (Oh this really was a musical in case anyone didn't know). I can't say for sure but I would guess that more than half of the lines were done singing.</p><p></p><p>Plot: There really was none. A barber get's mad for the death of his wife and goes on to a killing spree with lot's of singing. What can you say? It was weak to start with. Topple it with extreme predictability (I guessed "the Big Reveal" of the end in about ten minutes from the start), there really was only one thing that surpriced me and it was the fact that he did NOT kill a certain character.</p><p></p><p>There was way too much meaningfull staring around. They could have cut all that in half and it would have conveyed the message as well as did now.</p><p></p><p>The romantic subplots were there only to emphasis the drama of the ending and to give poor reason for certain events to happen. At one point I was really bored for one character to go into too lenghty moody singing about his futile love.</p><p></p><p>Can't thimk of more now. Overall, it was quite boring, but enjoyable if you happen to like this kind of macabre beauty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackrat, post: 4111504, member: 27761"] So I saw this on weekend and decided to give a review. Now I could ofcourse go the way of my little Toreador friend with whom I saw it, and say: OMG OMG it was done by Tim Burton so it is so cool like you know, because all Tim Burton does is like awesome because it's done by Tim Burton, and no matter what I'll never admit that there was anything bad to say. (Yeah, I had to listen to that for fifteen minutes after the movie). But instead I'll try to do a little less biased review. Don't get me wrong, I did in fact enjoy the movie, it's just that lots of vision don't make up for lack of plot and too much meaningful staring. Let's see: Visually: Very beautiful movie in the macabre way I enjoy. Now how couldn't it be, it had many beautiful actors. The mood was well implanted to dark victorian London and costume desing was done to emphasis that. The blood (which was plenty) was tacky as always in these kinds of movies but oddly it fit well here. I rather suspect that it was intentionally made to look too bright. Mr Depp has a good voice and although he isn't a singer he has a knack for that. Same can't be said for all the actors. There was some amount of poor singing, a little more good singing and quite a lot of mediocre singing. (Oh this really was a musical in case anyone didn't know). I can't say for sure but I would guess that more than half of the lines were done singing. Plot: There really was none. A barber get's mad for the death of his wife and goes on to a killing spree with lot's of singing. What can you say? It was weak to start with. Topple it with extreme predictability (I guessed "the Big Reveal" of the end in about ten minutes from the start), there really was only one thing that surpriced me and it was the fact that he did NOT kill a certain character. There was way too much meaningfull staring around. They could have cut all that in half and it would have conveyed the message as well as did now. The romantic subplots were there only to emphasis the drama of the ending and to give poor reason for certain events to happen. At one point I was really bored for one character to go into too lenghty moody singing about his futile love. Can't thimk of more now. Overall, it was quite boring, but enjoyable if you happen to like this kind of macabre beauty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sweeney Todd
Top