Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Swift spell as Standard Action?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 3103358" data-attributes="member: 31734"><p>The analogy doesn't break down. Besides flavor, the purpose of Energy Sub is to bypass energy resistant creatures (in this example fire). Agreed? When you encounter a non-resistant creature (of any energy) it doesn't matter if you have ES or not (and thus the whole example becomes irrelevant). Because we have to assume relevancy, the analogy is only applicable when a creature is resistant to the ES energy. Thus, if you don't allow stripping the metamagic feat, then ES would be an unfortunate spell preparation, <em>just like quicken should you need that quickened spell twice</em>.</p><p></p><p>In other words, it's a perfect analogy when you consider that stripping the metamagic gains you something over not-stripping. A similar analogy could not be applied for all metamagic feats, however. I fail to see, for example, how stripping Heighten Spell could ever gain.</p><p></p><p>But, surely you don't agree with Dracorat that you would allow stripping of Energy Sub on the fly? Wouldn't you prepare all your spells then with ES and just choose which one as you need it?</p><p> Exactly. I can see the design of a new spell's casting time like this: "We'll just make it a Swift action and that way it can never be used twice in one round, which would be broken." Is there such a spell? I don't know but I doubt it. At least I doubt one would really be 'broken'. But, the fact is that this increases the versitility of prepared spellcasters and does nothing for spontaneous-type spellcasters while stepping on their toes.</p><p></p><p>Consider a wizard going up against a cleric and his high SR planar ally. The wizard casts assay resistance, but it gets countered. Knowing he has little chance of affecting his opponent, he casts another assay resistance as a standard action (or in place?). Not really broken perhaps since he cannot do anything until next round, but it's certainly useful as it would negate additional counterspelling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 3103358, member: 31734"] The analogy doesn't break down. Besides flavor, the purpose of Energy Sub is to bypass energy resistant creatures (in this example fire). Agreed? When you encounter a non-resistant creature (of any energy) it doesn't matter if you have ES or not (and thus the whole example becomes irrelevant). Because we have to assume relevancy, the analogy is only applicable when a creature is resistant to the ES energy. Thus, if you don't allow stripping the metamagic feat, then ES would be an unfortunate spell preparation, [I]just like quicken should you need that quickened spell twice[/I]. In other words, it's a perfect analogy when you consider that stripping the metamagic gains you something over not-stripping. A similar analogy could not be applied for all metamagic feats, however. I fail to see, for example, how stripping Heighten Spell could ever gain. But, surely you don't agree with Dracorat that you would allow stripping of Energy Sub on the fly? Wouldn't you prepare all your spells then with ES and just choose which one as you need it? Exactly. I can see the design of a new spell's casting time like this: "We'll just make it a Swift action and that way it can never be used twice in one round, which would be broken." Is there such a spell? I don't know but I doubt it. At least I doubt one would really be 'broken'. But, the fact is that this increases the versitility of prepared spellcasters and does nothing for spontaneous-type spellcasters while stepping on their toes. Consider a wizard going up against a cleric and his high SR planar ally. The wizard casts assay resistance, but it gets countered. Knowing he has little chance of affecting his opponent, he casts another assay resistance as a standard action (or in place?). Not really broken perhaps since he cannot do anything until next round, but it's certainly useful as it would negate additional counterspelling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Swift spell as Standard Action?
Top