Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 3107396" data-attributes="member: 31734">This is the heart of the debate IMO.1. The Pro side says to allow it because Swift Action < Standard Action.2. The Con side then points out that Swift Action < Move Action, thus allowing 3 spells/round (or 4 for a choker wizard).3. The Pro side rebuts with the caveat that you must be able to use the swapped action for spellcasting normally to begin with.The problem with #3 is that it negates the original 'common sense' reason to begin with.  It then boils down to merely overriding the restriction on Swift spells as long as no other standard/full action spell was cast/will be cast that round.  That may be reasonable from a balance perspective but there's no longer a 'common sense' argument to be made.That last sentence is what I think the majority of this thread is about.  It is probably completely unnecessary from nearly everyone's perspective, except as a mental exercise.  <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></blockquote>