Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Swift spell as Standard Action?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Musrum" data-source="post: 3119154" data-attributes="member: 12269"><p>Actually I am not proposing that the Action Type changes. Simply that a Standard Action slot can be used to perform a Swift Action. This already has a precedent (with the Move Action).We are lifting a restriction which is the artifact of poor design (One Swift Action only) whilst still retaining the the restriction that really matters for game balance (Two Spells only).The four spell levels is paid so you can cast a spell as a Free Action (the no AoO is just gravy). Casting a spell as a Free Action is only valuable when you are doing something else with your turn (like casting another spell). So that is what you are paying for: casting two spells a round.No, but you have paid for the option (even though circumstances arise such that you choose not to exercise the option). WoTC explicitly gives you this option an all cases where Quicken is "Automatic". But with the expansion of the Quicken Free Action into the Swift Action (along with the extra spells etc.) they have failed to apply the necessary rigour to these changes. A small "corner case" is just getting bigger and bigger with each new Swift spell/feat/whatever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Musrum, post: 3119154, member: 12269"] Actually I am not proposing that the Action Type changes. Simply that a Standard Action slot can be used to perform a Swift Action. This already has a precedent (with the Move Action).We are lifting a restriction which is the artifact of poor design (One Swift Action only) whilst still retaining the the restriction that really matters for game balance (Two Spells only).The four spell levels is paid so you can cast a spell as a Free Action (the no AoO is just gravy). Casting a spell as a Free Action is only valuable when you are doing something else with your turn (like casting another spell). So that is what you are paying for: casting two spells a round.No, but you have paid for the option (even though circumstances arise such that you choose not to exercise the option). WoTC explicitly gives you this option an all cases where Quicken is "Automatic". But with the expansion of the Quicken Free Action into the Swift Action (along with the extra spells etc.) they have failed to apply the necessary rigour to these changes. A small "corner case" is just getting bigger and bigger with each new Swift spell/feat/whatever. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Swift spell as Standard Action?
Top