Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pukunui" data-source="post: 4509284" data-attributes="member: 54629">Thanks but no thanks. 3.5 was not our cup of tea.I'd prefer a straight Saga to "fantasy" conversion (like what you've already done) but with the "best of 4e" thrown in.My only real concern with using Saga rules for fantasy is that you can't do the heavily-armored warrior trope very well -- at least not at high levels. I wonder how difficult it would be to graft AC back onto the Saga rules ...What I'm actually thinking of at this point is using the Saga rules for PCs but continue to use the 4e monsters and such. I really like 4e from a DM's point of view. Pretty much the only two things I don't like about 4e are the class structure (talents are so much better than powers) and the plethora of dissociated mechanics.</blockquote>