Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sword&Board
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Korak" data-source="post: 1401939" data-attributes="member: 9781"><p>The builds referenced in this thread are not using the shields as weapons (not optimally anyway). They are all talking about shield and armor spec feats to raise ac, and ways to raise ac by taking attack penalties. Stacking all those things together = pathetic offensive output that is easy to ignore. Furthermore, your situation is a bit oversimplified. If the fight is in a relatively enclosed space and the party casters are appropriately trained in combat maneuvers (they know where to stand), then you can minimize the weaknesses of the slow movement, low to moderate offense, high ac tank. If however, the fight is outdoors, or involving opponents with high movement/tumble, or good reach, they can eat the casters while staying out of the full attack range of the 20' move tank (or even the move and attack range if terrain is rough enough - and no charges from the tank because of intervening PCs or difficult terrain).</p><p></p><p>Even so, I like the sword and board guy built as a two weapon fighter. I prefer him with a mithril bp or mithril chain shirt to keep movement high, as positioning is vital. This makes more sense anyway as you'll need a high dexterity for the two weapon fighting feats. Mix in some rog4 for sneak attack and uncanny dodge to keep your dex ac when flat footed, or some Bbn2 for fast movement and UD, or both if you feel like giving up the feats. The higher damage output afforded by two weapon fighting over a single weapon is vital in giving the DM a reason to fight the tank instead of passing him by.</p><p></p><p>My guy, for example is Hum Rng6. It is far from optimal, but I wanted to try one, and the skills are needed by the party.</p><p></p><p>H: EWP(bastard sword)</p><p>1: WF(bastard sword)</p><p>R1: Track</p><p>R2: Two Weapon Fighting</p><p>3: Improved Shield Bash</p><p>R3: Endurace</p><p>6: Shield Charge</p><p>R6: Improved Two Weapon Fighting</p><p></p><p>When I can afford a sunblade, I am going to use it as my offhand weapon and switch to a heavy spiked shield from a light spiked shield to increase AC and damage. This build gives me decent ac, but if I were to optomize it, I might do something like this:</p><p></p><p>Human Ftr6</p><p>H: Two Weapon Fighting</p><p>1: Improved Shield Bash</p><p>F1: Dodge</p><p>F2: Mobility</p><p>3: Combat Expertise</p><p>F4: Shield Charge</p><p>6: Improved Two Weapon Fighting</p><p>F6: Shield Slam</p><p></p><p>Heavy Spiked Shield is primary weapon, short sword (or kukri, or light pick) is offhand weapon. Future feats are spring attack, elusive target, weapon focus. Another fun synergy is the combination of shield charge with ride-by attack. That would only be useful in primarily outdoor campaigns, but still fun to consider. Food for thought, though I think very little of this applies to the original poster's question... sorry.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Korak, post: 1401939, member: 9781"] The builds referenced in this thread are not using the shields as weapons (not optimally anyway). They are all talking about shield and armor spec feats to raise ac, and ways to raise ac by taking attack penalties. Stacking all those things together = pathetic offensive output that is easy to ignore. Furthermore, your situation is a bit oversimplified. If the fight is in a relatively enclosed space and the party casters are appropriately trained in combat maneuvers (they know where to stand), then you can minimize the weaknesses of the slow movement, low to moderate offense, high ac tank. If however, the fight is outdoors, or involving opponents with high movement/tumble, or good reach, they can eat the casters while staying out of the full attack range of the 20' move tank (or even the move and attack range if terrain is rough enough - and no charges from the tank because of intervening PCs or difficult terrain). Even so, I like the sword and board guy built as a two weapon fighter. I prefer him with a mithril bp or mithril chain shirt to keep movement high, as positioning is vital. This makes more sense anyway as you'll need a high dexterity for the two weapon fighting feats. Mix in some rog4 for sneak attack and uncanny dodge to keep your dex ac when flat footed, or some Bbn2 for fast movement and UD, or both if you feel like giving up the feats. The higher damage output afforded by two weapon fighting over a single weapon is vital in giving the DM a reason to fight the tank instead of passing him by. My guy, for example is Hum Rng6. It is far from optimal, but I wanted to try one, and the skills are needed by the party. H: EWP(bastard sword) 1: WF(bastard sword) R1: Track R2: Two Weapon Fighting 3: Improved Shield Bash R3: Endurace 6: Shield Charge R6: Improved Two Weapon Fighting When I can afford a sunblade, I am going to use it as my offhand weapon and switch to a heavy spiked shield from a light spiked shield to increase AC and damage. This build gives me decent ac, but if I were to optomize it, I might do something like this: Human Ftr6 H: Two Weapon Fighting 1: Improved Shield Bash F1: Dodge F2: Mobility 3: Combat Expertise F4: Shield Charge 6: Improved Two Weapon Fighting F6: Shield Slam Heavy Spiked Shield is primary weapon, short sword (or kukri, or light pick) is offhand weapon. Future feats are spring attack, elusive target, weapon focus. Another fun synergy is the combination of shield charge with ride-by attack. That would only be useful in primarily outdoor campaigns, but still fun to consider. Food for thought, though I think very little of this applies to the original poster's question... sorry. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sword&Board
Top