Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cody C. Lewis" data-source="post: 6779181" data-attributes="member: 6802841"><p><strong>3 out of 5 rating for Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide</strong></p><p></p><p>I waited a bit before doing a review of this book, most likely because I kept changing my opinion of it. This book has been very confusing for me in how much I have enjoyed it mostly because of the difficulties in defining it. It is hard to tell if the book is successful at doing what it wanted well, because it is hard to tell what it was trying to do in the first place. After some consideration I believe it did in fact do what it wanted to do, but the question now is, is that something that appeals to everyone. So in short, if you have the correct expectations, this book is good, not great. If you have unrealistic expectations, you will be disappointed. </p><p></p><p><strong>What should you expect?</strong></p><p><strong></strong>A 5e guide of sorts for players and possibly GMs, that will lay a good foundation as an introduction to the realms. <strong><u>This 'guide' is a skeleton, it is a foundation, it is an introduction.</u></strong> I imagine that WotC was afraid that 4e caused a lot of people to push to other systems, and felt like they needed a book to lay the groundwork for both returning players and new players that may have fallen into the gap of being introduced to TTRPGs with another system. </p><p></p><p><strong>The Fluff</strong></p><p><strong></strong>The fluff is ok. It is not spectacular. It is presented in a sweeping overview. It is painted with the broad stroke of a large brush. Again, I want to reiterate this book is laying the foundation for people to understand Faerun. This book doesn't go into depth with who are the current masked lords, but instead describes the brief history of Waterdeep. It doesn't define NPCs of a city. But instead describes the layout of Baulder's Gate. Broad. Broad.Even the details on the deities are very generic. "This deity covers these things. These types of people worship them. This is their symbol. This is whether or not their altar's are large or small and if their worship is open or secretive." Which, by and large is all you NEED to know to incorporate them into a campaign. But things like X deity is plotting against Y deity for what they said at a deity class reunion 30 years ago... anything that specific is left out. Do not expect plot hooks.</p><p></p><p>So nothing regarding the fluff is done poorly. It accomplishes exactly what it tries to do.</p><p></p><p><strong>Crunch</strong></p><p><strong></strong>The crunch is good, but not great. My opinion is less based on the amount of options the book has or even the actual crunch itself, and rather the circumstances around the crunch. I'll explain; this is the first real expansion on the rules for 5e, outside of some sub-races and spells from Princes, as such this book feels like it just threw in some new stuff because... stuffs. The backgrounds are cool, but only 1 maybe two of them were completely new, while the others just gave variant features on existing backgrounds. The new archetypes are very cool... but Wizards didn't spread around the archetypes at all. Some classes received 2 new archetypes, some received 1, and others were completely ignored. Is this a positive or a negative? I'm not sure either way. If I had expected Wizards to release a single new archetype for each class, would they all have been good? Maybe they would have felt forced, or worse yet, been unbalanced. Chris Perkins has stated Wizards has no intention of publishing material just to publish material, so asking them to make new archetypes, just to produce material would have gone against this train of thought. However, on the other hand, as an example, there was nothing of real weight for my Bard in this book at all. Sure, it did have some nice background on the colleges, but even that was very small, and only usable as backgrounds for new characters.The spells in this book were interesting, but nearly unusable by anyone already playing a game. They would be fun for a very niche character concept, but I absolutely felt like they were in the book, just to fill the pages up.</p><p></p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p><p><strong></strong>I do not regret my purchase of this book. However, I intend on acquiring everything 5e. As far as my recommendation, it would be to pick up this book either only if you are a serious hobbyist, or to absolutely not pay $40/msrp for it. I purchased mine on Amazon for $23. That is about the correct value for this book. Unfortunately, that, more likely than not, means that this is not something I would recommend to pick up at a local shop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cody C. Lewis, post: 6779181, member: 6802841"] [b]3 out of 5 rating for Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide[/b] I waited a bit before doing a review of this book, most likely because I kept changing my opinion of it. This book has been very confusing for me in how much I have enjoyed it mostly because of the difficulties in defining it. It is hard to tell if the book is successful at doing what it wanted well, because it is hard to tell what it was trying to do in the first place. After some consideration I believe it did in fact do what it wanted to do, but the question now is, is that something that appeals to everyone. So in short, if you have the correct expectations, this book is good, not great. If you have unrealistic expectations, you will be disappointed. [B]What should you expect? [/B]A 5e guide of sorts for players and possibly GMs, that will lay a good foundation as an introduction to the realms. [B][U]This 'guide' is a skeleton, it is a foundation, it is an introduction.[/U][/B] I imagine that WotC was afraid that 4e caused a lot of people to push to other systems, and felt like they needed a book to lay the groundwork for both returning players and new players that may have fallen into the gap of being introduced to TTRPGs with another system. [B]The Fluff [/B]The fluff is ok. It is not spectacular. It is presented in a sweeping overview. It is painted with the broad stroke of a large brush. Again, I want to reiterate this book is laying the foundation for people to understand Faerun. This book doesn't go into depth with who are the current masked lords, but instead describes the brief history of Waterdeep. It doesn't define NPCs of a city. But instead describes the layout of Baulder's Gate. Broad. Broad.Even the details on the deities are very generic. "This deity covers these things. These types of people worship them. This is their symbol. This is whether or not their altar's are large or small and if their worship is open or secretive." Which, by and large is all you NEED to know to incorporate them into a campaign. But things like X deity is plotting against Y deity for what they said at a deity class reunion 30 years ago... anything that specific is left out. Do not expect plot hooks. So nothing regarding the fluff is done poorly. It accomplishes exactly what it tries to do. [B]Crunch [/B]The crunch is good, but not great. My opinion is less based on the amount of options the book has or even the actual crunch itself, and rather the circumstances around the crunch. I'll explain; this is the first real expansion on the rules for 5e, outside of some sub-races and spells from Princes, as such this book feels like it just threw in some new stuff because... stuffs. The backgrounds are cool, but only 1 maybe two of them were completely new, while the others just gave variant features on existing backgrounds. The new archetypes are very cool... but Wizards didn't spread around the archetypes at all. Some classes received 2 new archetypes, some received 1, and others were completely ignored. Is this a positive or a negative? I'm not sure either way. If I had expected Wizards to release a single new archetype for each class, would they all have been good? Maybe they would have felt forced, or worse yet, been unbalanced. Chris Perkins has stated Wizards has no intention of publishing material just to publish material, so asking them to make new archetypes, just to produce material would have gone against this train of thought. However, on the other hand, as an example, there was nothing of real weight for my Bard in this book at all. Sure, it did have some nice background on the colleges, but even that was very small, and only usable as backgrounds for new characters.The spells in this book were interesting, but nearly unusable by anyone already playing a game. They would be fun for a very niche character concept, but I absolutely felt like they were in the book, just to fill the pages up. [B]Conclusion [/B]I do not regret my purchase of this book. However, I intend on acquiring everything 5e. As far as my recommendation, it would be to pick up this book either only if you are a serious hobbyist, or to absolutely not pay $40/msrp for it. I purchased mine on Amazon for $23. That is about the correct value for this book. Unfortunately, that, more likely than not, means that this is not something I would recommend to pick up at a local shop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide
Top