Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sword of Swift Strikes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hatox" data-source="post: 7857517" data-attributes="member: 6861464"><p>Hey everyone,</p><p></p><p>recently I thought a lot about the Fighter-Samurais ability to turn an attack with advantage into two normal attacks. While I love the flavor of this I hate that its not something you think about using, because its just a straight upgrade. In both situations you roll 2 attacks, the only difference being if both of them are good you hit twice. Theres no downside. </p><p></p><p>So I thought about creating a magic item for my players with a similar effect, that has more thought put into it. What do you think about this:</p><p></p><p>Sword of Swift Strikes: Once per turn, when taking the attack action, you may forgo one attack to make two attacks at disadvantage, this disadvantage cannot be canceled with advantage.</p><p></p><p>The math should be smth like this: Lets say we have a 50% hit chance, so 11+ hits. With disadvantage the chance of an 11+ is only about 25%. The chance that at least one of those hits is ~44% so you loose around 6% chance to hit, to have about a 6% chance to have two hits. Now of course all these numbers get weird if you hitchance is different, so here are examples for 25%, 50% and 75%:</p><p>Basehitchance 25% -> one from two hits ~12% -> both hit ~0.4%: Loose 13% hitchance for 0.4% double hit chance</p><p>Basehitchance 50% -> one from two hits ~44% -> both hit ~6%: Loose 6% hitchance for 6% double hit chance</p><p>Basehitchance 75% -> one from two hits ~81% -> both hit ~31%: GAIN 6% hit chance AND 31% double hit chance</p><p></p><p>So if your chance to hit is very high, it´s not even a trade, but a straight upgrade again, but thats an example were a PC that rolls a 6 would hit. On lower hit chances its a trade off, and on really low chances its a desperation move, because of that I didnt limit its uses. What do you think? Since its just situational and useless if you have advantage, I would put it at uncommon. Do you think it should need attunement?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hatox, post: 7857517, member: 6861464"] Hey everyone, recently I thought a lot about the Fighter-Samurais ability to turn an attack with advantage into two normal attacks. While I love the flavor of this I hate that its not something you think about using, because its just a straight upgrade. In both situations you roll 2 attacks, the only difference being if both of them are good you hit twice. Theres no downside. So I thought about creating a magic item for my players with a similar effect, that has more thought put into it. What do you think about this: Sword of Swift Strikes: Once per turn, when taking the attack action, you may forgo one attack to make two attacks at disadvantage, this disadvantage cannot be canceled with advantage. The math should be smth like this: Lets say we have a 50% hit chance, so 11+ hits. With disadvantage the chance of an 11+ is only about 25%. The chance that at least one of those hits is ~44% so you loose around 6% chance to hit, to have about a 6% chance to have two hits. Now of course all these numbers get weird if you hitchance is different, so here are examples for 25%, 50% and 75%: Basehitchance 25% -> one from two hits ~12% -> both hit ~0.4%: Loose 13% hitchance for 0.4% double hit chance Basehitchance 50% -> one from two hits ~44% -> both hit ~6%: Loose 6% hitchance for 6% double hit chance Basehitchance 75% -> one from two hits ~81% -> both hit ~31%: GAIN 6% hit chance AND 31% double hit chance So if your chance to hit is very high, it´s not even a trade, but a straight upgrade again, but thats an example were a PC that rolls a 6 would hit. On lower hit chances its a trade off, and on really low chances its a desperation move, because of that I didnt limit its uses. What do you think? Since its just situational and useless if you have advantage, I would put it at uncommon. Do you think it should need attunement? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sword of Swift Strikes
Top