Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
SWSE Experiences & 4E Hunches
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ZSutherland" data-source="post: 3741086" data-attributes="member: 7638"><p>These are some extrapolations from my early experience with SWSE, and hunches I'm making about things we'll see in 4E given the comments that SWSE is a sort of preview of 4E.</p><p></p><p>1) Protection against bad DMs - I think it was Mearls who originally remarked on this concept, but 3E at times seemed overly structured to protect players from bad DMs. Now, I'm all for advice and guidelines to help turn bad DMs into better DMs and mediocre to good DMs into great DMs. However, things like the wealth-by-level rules and all the assumptions that came with it, CR/EL being based on a 4 PC party with all 4 major roles covered, and the stark disparity between skills that you trained and those that you didn't seemed to really get in the way at times. In my ~8 hours of running a SWSE game for 3 players, this is much less problematic. It's a lot harder to accidentally kill a PC, even at 1st level, than in 3E because Force Points are a limited but relatively plentiful resource to salvage such a situation. This doesn't translate to boring/unchallenging combat, it just gives me and my players room to experiment, to stretch and try things out. Our last session ended with the players (still 1st level) being ambushed in a docking bay by 6 attackers with blaster rifles. While the NPC pilot, co-pilot, and the party's cowardly astromech droid high-tailed it aboard the ship to get it prepped, the PCs had an exciting and tense battle with the riflemen. Second-winds were taken, force points were spent, cover was put to good use, and smart tactical decisions were made by both players and NPCs. While the encounter was, technically, only EL2, that many combatants is something I've always been hesitant to attempt w/ 1st level characters in D&D, because 1 PC is so likely to die, and a TPK isn't hard to imagine. Here, I just shrugged my shoulders, assumed that they'd use Force Points to save their bacon if there was a bad roll, and unloaded on them. It was great!</p><p></p><p>2) Combat takes just as long, but each players turn is much shorter. I'm sure that this is partially because they're still low-level, but the Saga writers have done a great job of providing even low-level characters with useful choices to be made in combat each round. They're simple, though. Should I auto-fire that group over there, to do a little damage to several enemies or target a specific one and hope to take him down? Where's the most advantageous spot on the board I can get to for purposes of cover? Should I charge that guy with my lightsaber, or use Move Object to take away his cover so the Soldier can put him away? This keeps the rounds short, but the focus on multiple opponent encounters means that rounds are shorter, but there are more of them, so combat has a good heroic feeling without feeling dragged out and clunky. I secretly believe that this has a lot to do with the very specific 1 standard, 1 move, 1 swift action (and the large number of actions that used to be free that are now swift) and the removal of the 5 foot step.</p><p></p><p>3) Leveling up is easy. My PCs finally leveled to 2 at the end of our last session, and even though we only had one book, it took all of about 20 minutes for everyone to level up.</p><p></p><p>4) Assuming that the Saga skill system is adopted for 4E, the Skill Focus Feat will have to change. The Wiz-Os on the WotC forums suggested the other day, that a good house-rule, for people who thought an additional +5 at first level was too much, would be to change the feat to "Your level based bonus in this skill is equal to your level, instead of the normal 1/2 level." I'd be willing to wager that's exactly how it works in 4E.</p><p></p><p>5) Making NPCs is quick and easy. With no skill ranks, making even higher level characters never takes more than 15-20 minutes, and most of that time is deciding what feats and talents are appropriate, not clunky math.</p><p></p><p>Anyone notice anything about SWSE that they think is likely to show up in 4E and positively affect how the game is played?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ZSutherland, post: 3741086, member: 7638"] These are some extrapolations from my early experience with SWSE, and hunches I'm making about things we'll see in 4E given the comments that SWSE is a sort of preview of 4E. 1) Protection against bad DMs - I think it was Mearls who originally remarked on this concept, but 3E at times seemed overly structured to protect players from bad DMs. Now, I'm all for advice and guidelines to help turn bad DMs into better DMs and mediocre to good DMs into great DMs. However, things like the wealth-by-level rules and all the assumptions that came with it, CR/EL being based on a 4 PC party with all 4 major roles covered, and the stark disparity between skills that you trained and those that you didn't seemed to really get in the way at times. In my ~8 hours of running a SWSE game for 3 players, this is much less problematic. It's a lot harder to accidentally kill a PC, even at 1st level, than in 3E because Force Points are a limited but relatively plentiful resource to salvage such a situation. This doesn't translate to boring/unchallenging combat, it just gives me and my players room to experiment, to stretch and try things out. Our last session ended with the players (still 1st level) being ambushed in a docking bay by 6 attackers with blaster rifles. While the NPC pilot, co-pilot, and the party's cowardly astromech droid high-tailed it aboard the ship to get it prepped, the PCs had an exciting and tense battle with the riflemen. Second-winds were taken, force points were spent, cover was put to good use, and smart tactical decisions were made by both players and NPCs. While the encounter was, technically, only EL2, that many combatants is something I've always been hesitant to attempt w/ 1st level characters in D&D, because 1 PC is so likely to die, and a TPK isn't hard to imagine. Here, I just shrugged my shoulders, assumed that they'd use Force Points to save their bacon if there was a bad roll, and unloaded on them. It was great! 2) Combat takes just as long, but each players turn is much shorter. I'm sure that this is partially because they're still low-level, but the Saga writers have done a great job of providing even low-level characters with useful choices to be made in combat each round. They're simple, though. Should I auto-fire that group over there, to do a little damage to several enemies or target a specific one and hope to take him down? Where's the most advantageous spot on the board I can get to for purposes of cover? Should I charge that guy with my lightsaber, or use Move Object to take away his cover so the Soldier can put him away? This keeps the rounds short, but the focus on multiple opponent encounters means that rounds are shorter, but there are more of them, so combat has a good heroic feeling without feeling dragged out and clunky. I secretly believe that this has a lot to do with the very specific 1 standard, 1 move, 1 swift action (and the large number of actions that used to be free that are now swift) and the removal of the 5 foot step. 3) Leveling up is easy. My PCs finally leveled to 2 at the end of our last session, and even though we only had one book, it took all of about 20 minutes for everyone to level up. 4) Assuming that the Saga skill system is adopted for 4E, the Skill Focus Feat will have to change. The Wiz-Os on the WotC forums suggested the other day, that a good house-rule, for people who thought an additional +5 at first level was too much, would be to change the feat to "Your level based bonus in this skill is equal to your level, instead of the normal 1/2 level." I'd be willing to wager that's exactly how it works in 4E. 5) Making NPCs is quick and easy. With no skill ranks, making even higher level characters never takes more than 15-20 minutes, and most of that time is deciding what feats and talents are appropriate, not clunky math. Anyone notice anything about SWSE that they think is likely to show up in 4E and positively affect how the game is played? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
SWSE Experiences & 4E Hunches
Top