Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 8418986" data-attributes="member: 6696971">To riff off of what [USER=99817]@chaochou[/USER] has just written above, I wonder what would happen at the following FKR table:* 4 players + 1 GM*1 player is interacting with the GM exclusively in a protracted scene* During the protracted 1 on 1 scene, the other 3 players start to talk to each other while inhabiting their characters and faithfully "playing the world" based on the conceits of character design and play (looking at Dark Empires <a href="https://d3b4g.itch.io/dark-empires" target="_blank">Dark Empires by D3B4G</a> , they're using all of the stuff on the bottom page 2 to page 3 and the outlined premise of play).* After the protracted scene that the 1 player + 1 GM plays out, the conversation of those 3 players (not overseen by nor vetted by the GM but entirely hewing to "playing the world" and the conceits of the game's character building, theme, and premise) has established a few layers of fiction.  They now make a collective action declaration that is contingent upon that fiction that the 3 of them have established being true.  What happens?  Is this a violation?  Is this principled play?  Is there no normative statement about FKR play that can categorize this event?</blockquote>