Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
System matters and free kriegsspiel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 8419414" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>I'll bite.</p><p></p><p>I think you started by identifying the division correctly. But then ... not so much. So I will explain this in more detail. </p><p></p><p><strong>Player agency</strong> (in other words, do players have <em>meaningful choices</em>) is one thing.</p><p><strong>Player authority</strong> is a different thing.</p><p></p><p>Let's break down player agency, first.</p><p></p><p>To have meaningful choice (beyond chargen, etc.), you usually need three things:</p><p>A. Player has control over the alter ego ("PC") decisions.</p><p>B. Decision must have consequences within the gameworld.</p><p>C. Player can reasonably anticipate consequences before making decisions.</p><p></p><p>A, B, C. That's a pretty standard way to look at it. Right? In a traditional RPG, such as D&D, this is achievable through the standard process of play.</p><p>1. The player declares the action.</p><p>2. The action will have consequences (that the DM will narrate) within the gameworld.</p><p>3. The player can reasonable anticipate the consequences of the decision.</p><p></p><p>Again, all of this requires the basic background of "Don't be a jerk" for the DM and the player - but it works. And it's the same with FKR, too!</p><p></p><p>When does this break? On the standard issues that people talk about in trad games when discussing player agency.</p><p></p><p>Player says, "I go west."</p><p>(DM has only planned one combat, and it was to the east, so moves it on the map to the east)</p><p><em>The action had no consequences- no agency.</em></p><p></p><p>The bard surrenders to the party.</p><p>Snarf says, "I kill the bard!"</p><p>The DM says, "No, you character wouldn't do that."</p><p><em>The player isn't allowed to declare their own action.</em></p><p></p><p>Fenris comes up with a great plan to bamboozle the shopkeeper.</p><p>The DM doesn't want that to happen, so decides that there is a spell there that is triggered by any bamboozling and prevents Fenris's plan.</p><p><em>The player could not reasonably anticipate the consequences of the decision. </em></p><p></p><p></p><p>Here, we have examples of the type that are CONSTANTLY DISCUSSED at enworld in terms of player agency- for someone to label these as "not player agency" is beyond silly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That said, this is different that player authority. Player authority (the ability to narrate the fiction, or decide consequences) is also important to people, but to have a real discussion, you really need to separate it out from player agency.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 8419414, member: 7023840"] I'll bite. I think you started by identifying the division correctly. But then ... not so much. So I will explain this in more detail. [B]Player agency[/B] (in other words, do players have [I]meaningful choices[/I]) is one thing. [B]Player authority[/B] is a different thing. Let's break down player agency, first. To have meaningful choice (beyond chargen, etc.), you usually need three things: A. Player has control over the alter ego ("PC") decisions. B. Decision must have consequences within the gameworld. C. Player can reasonably anticipate consequences before making decisions. A, B, C. That's a pretty standard way to look at it. Right? In a traditional RPG, such as D&D, this is achievable through the standard process of play. 1. The player declares the action. 2. The action will have consequences (that the DM will narrate) within the gameworld. 3. The player can reasonable anticipate the consequences of the decision. Again, all of this requires the basic background of "Don't be a jerk" for the DM and the player - but it works. And it's the same with FKR, too! When does this break? On the standard issues that people talk about in trad games when discussing player agency. Player says, "I go west." (DM has only planned one combat, and it was to the east, so moves it on the map to the east) [I]The action had no consequences- no agency.[/I] The bard surrenders to the party. Snarf says, "I kill the bard!" The DM says, "No, you character wouldn't do that." [I]The player isn't allowed to declare their own action.[/I] Fenris comes up with a great plan to bamboozle the shopkeeper. The DM doesn't want that to happen, so decides that there is a spell there that is triggered by any bamboozling and prevents Fenris's plan. [I]The player could not reasonably anticipate the consequences of the decision. [/I] Here, we have examples of the type that are CONSTANTLY DISCUSSED at enworld in terms of player agency- for someone to label these as "not player agency" is beyond silly. That said, this is different that player authority. Player authority (the ability to narrate the fiction, or decide consequences) is also important to people, but to have a real discussion, you really need to separate it out from player agency. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
System matters and free kriegsspiel
Top