Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mr. Teapot" data-source="post: 4255350" data-attributes="member: 62191">Just the opposite, really.&nbsp; When I made my portion of the spreadsheet, I wasn't always sure which was a class's primary stat and which were secondary.&nbsp; More importantly, I didn't know the relative value of having bonuses to secondary stats versus primary stats (I expect that debate to last 4e's lifespan).&nbsp; According tot heir racial entry, Tieflings make good Warlords, when they get bonuses to the two secondary stats but not to the universal stat.&nbsp; Is this as good as a human getting a bonus to just the primary?&nbsp; Or a Dragonborn getting a bonus to the primary and a secondary?&nbsp; I can't say yet, as I don't have the books, and doubt I'll know after I get them.So I just was totalling up how many primary or secondary stats a race/class combo shared.(As Asmor noted, the dwarf cleric was a typo, due to my human error which has now been fixed.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mr. Teapot, post: 4255350, member: 62191"] Just the opposite, really. When I made my portion of the spreadsheet, I wasn't always sure which was a class's primary stat and which were secondary. More importantly, I didn't know the relative value of having bonuses to secondary stats versus primary stats (I expect that debate to last 4e's lifespan). According tot heir racial entry, Tieflings make good Warlords, when they get bonuses to the two secondary stats but not to the universal stat. Is this as good as a human getting a bonus to just the primary? Or a Dragonborn getting a bonus to the primary and a secondary? I can't say yet, as I don't have the books, and doubt I'll know after I get them. So I just was totalling up how many primary or secondary stats a race/class combo shared. (As Asmor noted, the dwarf cleric was a typo, due to my human error which has now been fixed.) [/QUOTE]

Verification