Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TBeholder" data-source="post: 7660471" data-attributes="member: 41606">This article is a thing of beauty.&nbsp;No objections on the general principle, but... how to put it delicately... No. I cannot. Let me just use links to webcomics to illustrate concepts.<a href="http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2001-07-26" target="_blank">Anyhow, glad he noticed this.</a>.Wait, this comes from someone from the crew that once upon a time released Neverwinter Nights? The game mostly made of lolrandom stuff occasionally using proper nouns from FR? Even before 4e?<a href="http://www.nerfnow.com/comic/717" target="_blank">Huh, it's strange how some people ran D&amp;D into such a dead end.</a>&nbsp;Become TSR again? I dunno, all signs point at &quot;they already have produced viable clones of Lorraine Williams, with <a href="http://wiki.rpg.net/index.php/File:MPost1383-Toomanynagas11pb.jpg" target="_blank">excessive redundancy</a>&quot;.&nbsp;Cool, <a href="http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2011-10-27" target="_blank">two</a> in <a href="http://www.webcomicsnation.com/shaenongarrity/skinhorse/series.php?view=archive&amp;chapter=27144#strip4" target="_blank">one</a>!&nbsp;How so? It looks like D&amp;D5 = D&amp;D3 (most of d20 base) + D&amp;D4 (ritual casting, bells and whistles per day, general style...) + C&amp;C (saving throws, skills).But D&amp;D3 and D&amp;D4 are &quot;the two previous editions&quot;, and Castles &amp; Crusades wasn't produced by TSR. I'm reasonably sure that D&amp;D5 was actually playtested, too. So... exactly what there is &quot;more like&quot; TSR?&nbsp;There's always &quot;chicken or egg&quot; question... but yeah, it's funny how his eyes suddenly opened now... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devious.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":]" title="Devious&nbsp; &nbsp; :]" data-shortname=":]" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="TBeholder, post: 7660471, member: 41606"] This article is a thing of beauty. No objections on the general principle, but... how to put it delicately... No. I cannot. Let me just use links to webcomics to illustrate concepts. [url="http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2001-07-26"]Anyhow, glad he [I]noticed[/I] this.[/url]. Wait, this comes from someone from the crew that once upon a time released [I]Neverwinter Nights[/I]? The game mostly made of lolrandom stuff occasionally using proper nouns from FR? [i]Even before 4e[/i]? [url=http://www.nerfnow.com/comic/717]Huh, it's strange how some people ran D&D into such a dead end.[/url] Become TSR again? I dunno, all signs point at "they already have produced viable clones of Lorraine Williams, with [url=http://wiki.rpg.net/index.php/File:MPost1383-Toomanynagas11pb.jpg]excessive redundancy[/url]". Cool, [url=http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2011-10-27]two[/url] in [url=http://www.webcomicsnation.com/shaenongarrity/skinhorse/series.php?view=archive&chapter=27144#strip4]one[/url]! How so? It looks like D&D5 = D&D3 (most of d20 base) + D&D4 (ritual casting, bells and whistles per day, general style...) + C&C (saving throws, skills). But D&D3 and D&D4 [i]are[/i] "the two previous editions", and Castles & Crusades wasn't produced by TSR. I'm reasonably sure that D&D5 was actually [I]playtested[/I], too. So... exactly what there is "more like" TSR? There's always "chicken or egg" question... but yeah, it's funny how [I]his eyes suddenly opened now[/I]... :] [/QUOTE]

Verification