Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tactical Boardgame?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kahuna Burger" data-source="post: 4086978" data-attributes="member: 8439"><p>While this make sense, I don't see the point of criticizing people for judging the new edition based on an experience basically designed for them to judge the new edition... I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but the point of the event was "Try out 4e! Play it now!" right? So if* the people didn't get to see the social resolution system, or make any customization decisions on their characters** or use their abilities in non combat ways, why shouldn't they judge the experience they were given to judge? </p><p></p><p>*big if on some of the points. I don't know if there was at least some "impassable terrain" to get around.</p><p></p><p>** I have found it easy in one shots to leave a few options for the players to customize, and I'm not being paid to design them or using them to sell a product, so I don't think letting the players do some of the pregen would have been impossible.</p><p></p><p>I guess the OP's criticism, while valid in some ways, bugs me the same way as the "you can't decide you wouldn't like [show X] just because every ad for it you see is completely unappealing - it's not really like that!" comments I used to get on some programs bugged me. If the ONLY info I have on something is coming from people whose goal is to get me to like it, and I don't like it, why should I put in the extra effort to sell their product for them? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> My philosophy is that you <strong>can</strong> judge a book by it's cover if the title and cover art were picked by the author, and you can judge 4e by an event billed as the chance to play 4e.</p><p></p><p>Edit : in another thread, someone tallied their experiences under 4 different DMs, So I would say there was room for a "social resolution heavy game" and a "non social / non combat challenge game" for folks to try if they are interested in that aspect and still get to try the combat from the perspective of at least two different classes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kahuna Burger, post: 4086978, member: 8439"] While this make sense, I don't see the point of criticizing people for judging the new edition based on an experience basically designed for them to judge the new edition... I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but the point of the event was "Try out 4e! Play it now!" right? So if* the people didn't get to see the social resolution system, or make any customization decisions on their characters** or use their abilities in non combat ways, why shouldn't they judge the experience they were given to judge? *big if on some of the points. I don't know if there was at least some "impassable terrain" to get around. ** I have found it easy in one shots to leave a few options for the players to customize, and I'm not being paid to design them or using them to sell a product, so I don't think letting the players do some of the pregen would have been impossible. I guess the OP's criticism, while valid in some ways, bugs me the same way as the "you can't decide you wouldn't like [show X] just because every ad for it you see is completely unappealing - it's not really like that!" comments I used to get on some programs bugged me. If the ONLY info I have on something is coming from people whose goal is to get me to like it, and I don't like it, why should I put in the extra effort to sell their product for them? :confused: My philosophy is that you [b]can[/b] judge a book by it's cover if the title and cover art were picked by the author, and you can judge 4e by an event billed as the chance to play 4e. Edit : in another thread, someone tallied their experiences under 4 different DMs, So I would say there was room for a "social resolution heavy game" and a "non social / non combat challenge game" for folks to try if they are interested in that aspect and still get to try the combat from the perspective of at least two different classes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tactical Boardgame?
Top