Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tactical Boardgame?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Irda Ranger" data-source="post: 4087737" data-attributes="member: 1003"><p>Just how obvious did they have to make it? Wasn't the fact that the Social Encounters rules were not distributed enough of a clue? Maybe WotC figured that presenting an "adventure" that was nothing more than six combats in a direct row was enough of a hint that this was solely a preview of the combat section?</p><p></p><p><em>Could </em>WotC have included the Social Encounter rules and a couple Social Encounter rules? Sure. But they didn't.</p><p></p><p>Here's the OP's point:</p><p></p><p><u>Valid Criticism</u>: "Well, I've run through a couple playtest combats, and based on my experience the Ranger appears to be too powerful in all combat situations relative to the other PCs." This would be valid because the player has seen a variety of PCs and a variety of tactical situations; enough to form a tentative opinion.</p><p></p><p><u>Non-Valid Criticism</u>: "Well, I've run through a couple playtest combats, and clearly there is too much focus on combat in 4E." This doesn't compute because the commenter has to direct experience with the non-combat parts of the game. It's not enough to know one thing to make a comparison; you have to know at least two things. It would be as invalid to say "Rituals just aren't good enough to replace the spell list's shortcomings." How could you possibly know that yet.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Non-valid criticism, more like, for the reasons outlined above.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If you're commenting on things you have no information about, that's your fault.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This could well be.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Relatedly ....</p><p></p><p></p><p>That wasn't the OPs point at all. Forming opinions based on information you have is fine. It's forming opinions based on information you don't have that the OP is complaining about.</p><p></p><p><u>The Complaint</u>: 4E overly focuses on tactical combat.</p><p></p><p><u>The Problem With The Complaint</u>: Until you've seen the game as a whole, you can't know whether too much effort (or page count) has been spent on any one part. It's inherantly a holistic exercise to say "Too much was committed to X."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Irda Ranger, post: 4087737, member: 1003"] Just how obvious did they have to make it? Wasn't the fact that the Social Encounters rules were not distributed enough of a clue? Maybe WotC figured that presenting an "adventure" that was nothing more than six combats in a direct row was enough of a hint that this was solely a preview of the combat section? [I]Could [/I]WotC have included the Social Encounter rules and a couple Social Encounter rules? Sure. But they didn't. Here's the OP's point: [U]Valid Criticism[/U]: "Well, I've run through a couple playtest combats, and based on my experience the Ranger appears to be too powerful in all combat situations relative to the other PCs." This would be valid because the player has seen a variety of PCs and a variety of tactical situations; enough to form a tentative opinion. [U]Non-Valid Criticism[/U]: "Well, I've run through a couple playtest combats, and clearly there is too much focus on combat in 4E." This doesn't compute because the commenter has to direct experience with the non-combat parts of the game. It's not enough to know one thing to make a comparison; you have to know at least two things. It would be as invalid to say "Rituals just aren't good enough to replace the spell list's shortcomings." How could you possibly know that yet. Non-valid criticism, more like, for the reasons outlined above. If you're commenting on things you have no information about, that's your fault. This could well be. Relatedly .... That wasn't the OPs point at all. Forming opinions based on information you have is fine. It's forming opinions based on information you don't have that the OP is complaining about. [U]The Complaint[/U]: 4E overly focuses on tactical combat. [U]The Problem With The Complaint[/U]: Until you've seen the game as a whole, you can't know whether too much effort (or page count) has been spent on any one part. It's inherantly a holistic exercise to say "Too much was committed to X." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tactical Boardgame?
Top