Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tactical Combat Module, hasn't it always been there?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7935512" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>Still after all these years I hear people complain that 5e is not modular enough or that WotC has broken their promise to deliver modularity. Yesterday I was browsing the DMG with this in mind and counted at least <strong>thirty</strong> paragraphs of stuff which I would definitely consider to be "optional rules modules".</p><p></p><p>Some of them are really small (e.g. the Flanking "module" is practically a single rule) but nevertheless can have a significant impact on gameplay (indeed, try add Flanking to your game if you don't believe me), while others are fairly complex with a page or more of description.</p><p></p><p>Many aren't explicitly listed as optional, but they effectively are, as they are definitely "modular" in the purest sense i.e. you don't need to change other parts of the game whether you use them or skip them. The primary example for me is Inspiration, which I am sure many consider "essential" in their game, except that I have never used it and my game still works without further changes. Even the whole combat grid can be considered an optional module, in fact I am not using that either (and no, I am not ignoring distances and areas in my game, I am just measuring them in every direction instead of trying to adhere to a discrete subdivision of space).</p><p></p><p>Sometimes I think many people might have in mind the mythic idea of a "tactical combat module" when they claim that WotC didn't deliver. So while thinking about it, I decided to cherrypick a bunch of smaller modules from the DMG and see if altogether they form a decent tactical combat (assembled) module. Here is what I came up with:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">either combat grid or gridless combat, but definitely avoid TotM</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">ALL optional combat Actions (Disarm, Mark, Overrun, Shove Aside, Tumble, Climb Onto)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Flanking</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Facing</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Speed Factor</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mobs</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Hitting Cover</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Cleaving Through Creatures</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Massive Damage</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Morale</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mounted Combat, Underwater Combat and Weather rules when appropriate*</li> </ul><p></p><p>*these are not explicitly optional rules</p><p></p><p>You can also feature the Injuries and the Chases modules, but I decided not to include them in the list because they are more about what happens <em>after</em> combat rather than <em>during</em>.</p><p></p><p>So what do you think about it? I can imagine how each one of those modules can be disliked, but all together it's hard for me to believe that this isn't already quite tactical and complex!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 7935512, member: 1465"] Still after all these years I hear people complain that 5e is not modular enough or that WotC has broken their promise to deliver modularity. Yesterday I was browsing the DMG with this in mind and counted at least [B]thirty[/B] paragraphs of stuff which I would definitely consider to be "optional rules modules". Some of them are really small (e.g. the Flanking "module" is practically a single rule) but nevertheless can have a significant impact on gameplay (indeed, try add Flanking to your game if you don't believe me), while others are fairly complex with a page or more of description. Many aren't explicitly listed as optional, but they effectively are, as they are definitely "modular" in the purest sense i.e. you don't need to change other parts of the game whether you use them or skip them. The primary example for me is Inspiration, which I am sure many consider "essential" in their game, except that I have never used it and my game still works without further changes. Even the whole combat grid can be considered an optional module, in fact I am not using that either (and no, I am not ignoring distances and areas in my game, I am just measuring them in every direction instead of trying to adhere to a discrete subdivision of space). Sometimes I think many people might have in mind the mythic idea of a "tactical combat module" when they claim that WotC didn't deliver. So while thinking about it, I decided to cherrypick a bunch of smaller modules from the DMG and see if altogether they form a decent tactical combat (assembled) module. Here is what I came up with: [LIST] [*]either combat grid or gridless combat, but definitely avoid TotM [*]ALL optional combat Actions (Disarm, Mark, Overrun, Shove Aside, Tumble, Climb Onto) [*]Flanking [*]Facing [*]Speed Factor [*]Mobs [*]Hitting Cover [*]Cleaving Through Creatures [*]Massive Damage [*]Morale [*]Mounted Combat, Underwater Combat and Weather rules when appropriate* [/LIST] *these are not explicitly optional rules You can also feature the Injuries and the Chases modules, but I decided not to include them in the list because they are more about what happens [I]after[/I] combat rather than [I]during[/I]. So what do you think about it? I can imagine how each one of those modules can be disliked, but all together it's hard for me to believe that this isn't already quite tactical and complex! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tactical Combat Module, hasn't it always been there?
Top