Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tactical detail and complexity, reliance on minis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Feything" data-source="post: 3737010" data-attributes="member: 54618"><p>First, to quote myself from WOTC's official boards:</p><p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">There is one thing I really dislike about the current edition which I hope will change in 4E.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">I'm talking about the, at least in my opinion, slightly too tactically involved combat.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">With all the various elements, abilities and options related to combat, such as AoOs, free actions, standard actions, move actions, flanking etc., combat slows to a crawl.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Using counters or minis is more or less a must for most fights, at least if you want the PCs and NPCs/monsters to get a chance to properly use all their combat-related feats and abilities.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">In the more complex battles, I've seen a night of roleplaying, storytelling and imagination turn into a tactical boardgame - with immersion pretty much ruined.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">I realise that different players want different things from the game, and that the tactical element is the main thing for many. For myself, and pretty much all the people I game with these days it is just another element of the game, and not one that we really want to focus on. Storytelling, roleplaying and immersion are more important to us - with combat ideally playing the role of action sequences (with their prospect of danger) rather than a mini-game in its own right.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">So... A major wish for 4E for me (and my gaming group, which says "hi!" by the way) is faster and simpler combat which is easier to play without visual aids like minis or counters.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Trying to simplify combat in our house-rules for the current edition proved to be too much of a challenge. Because so many feats, spells, items and class abilities were tied into the tactical system, a lot would have to be ripped out or changed.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">If the default combat-system for 4E is not simpler/faster, or less reliant on visual aids, then I would hope we could at least get a couple of pages with an optional way to do simpler and quicker combat. </p><p></p><p>In one of the designer-interview videos from Gencon (don't remember which one at the moment, and couldn't find it now) it is said that in 4E, minis will neither be more or less necessary to play the game than they are currently. It is also hinted that they might be less important than in 3E, but that statement was modified almost straight away.</p><p>Another thing which might remedy the situation slightly are the simplified monster-stats.</p><p></p><p>Personally, as stated above, I've seen sessions devolve into a sort of tactical boardgame during prolonged battles. This bothers me as a DM, and it's something my players have stated they do not like either. </p><p></p><p>I'd be interested to know how much tactical detail and complexity you prefer in a tabletop RPG, and whether or not there have been any other hints towards a change in how combat will play in 4E?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Feything, post: 3737010, member: 54618"] First, to quote myself from WOTC's official boards: [INDENT] There is one thing I really dislike about the current edition which I hope will change in 4E. I'm talking about the, at least in my opinion, slightly too tactically involved combat. With all the various elements, abilities and options related to combat, such as AoOs, free actions, standard actions, move actions, flanking etc., combat slows to a crawl. Using counters or minis is more or less a must for most fights, at least if you want the PCs and NPCs/monsters to get a chance to properly use all their combat-related feats and abilities. In the more complex battles, I've seen a night of roleplaying, storytelling and imagination turn into a tactical boardgame - with immersion pretty much ruined. I realise that different players want different things from the game, and that the tactical element is the main thing for many. For myself, and pretty much all the people I game with these days it is just another element of the game, and not one that we really want to focus on. Storytelling, roleplaying and immersion are more important to us - with combat ideally playing the role of action sequences (with their prospect of danger) rather than a mini-game in its own right. So... A major wish for 4E for me (and my gaming group, which says "hi!" by the way) is faster and simpler combat which is easier to play without visual aids like minis or counters. Trying to simplify combat in our house-rules for the current edition proved to be too much of a challenge. Because so many feats, spells, items and class abilities were tied into the tactical system, a lot would have to be ripped out or changed. If the default combat-system for 4E is not simpler/faster, or less reliant on visual aids, then I would hope we could at least get a couple of pages with an optional way to do simpler and quicker combat. [/INDENT] In one of the designer-interview videos from Gencon (don't remember which one at the moment, and couldn't find it now) it is said that in 4E, minis will neither be more or less necessary to play the game than they are currently. It is also hinted that they might be less important than in 3E, but that statement was modified almost straight away. Another thing which might remedy the situation slightly are the simplified monster-stats. Personally, as stated above, I've seen sessions devolve into a sort of tactical boardgame during prolonged battles. This bothers me as a DM, and it's something my players have stated they do not like either. I'd be interested to know how much tactical detail and complexity you prefer in a tabletop RPG, and whether or not there have been any other hints towards a change in how combat will play in 4E? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tactical detail and complexity, reliance on minis
Top