Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tactical Quotient (TQ) for monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 4107229" data-attributes="member: 58197"><p>Well, no need to pile on the "wolves use smart tactics" bandwagon. So...</p><p></p><p>I assume that a monster has whatever instincts are required to use its abilities in a generally sound fashion. If something has a breath weapon, for example, it will try to blast a group of opponents in preference to a single target; even with animal intelligence, that should be an instinctive behavior. If it gets bonuses for a bunch of it piling on the same target, then it will pile on. Beyond that, I use the following broad strategies for monsters:</p><p></p><p><strong>Mindless</strong>. Pick the nearest target, charge it, and maul it until either it's dead or you are. If multiple nearest targets, choose at random, or whichever looks tastiest. This level of tactics I usually reserve for zombies, giant insects, and so on.</p><p></p><p><strong>Retaliatory</strong>. Pick whichever target is dishing out the most damage. This is what I often use for monsters that are not terribly bright and are either fighting solo or don't coordinate well. An ogre is likely to use this strategy--bash the one who's hurting you.</p><p></p><p><strong>Wolfpack</strong>. Haven't actually used this much, but I plan to do more of it in 4E. As a group, pick whichever target looks weakest and take it down, while avoiding its stronger allies. Good for reasonably smart pack hunters, like wolves and gnolls.</p><p></p><p><strong>Soldier</strong>. This monster understands the principles of D&D combat--concentrate firepower, kill spellcasters first, guard your own casters, don't go toe-to-toe with the raging barbarian, avoid letting sneaky-looking people flank you. At the same time, it isn't a tactical genius and doesn't come up with really clever plans. Appropriate for intelligent fighters experienced in organized warfare, like hobgoblins.</p><p></p><p><strong>Boss Monster</strong>. This is where I pull out all the stops and play the monster as if I were running a PC, using every nasty tactic I can think of. Appropriate for intelligent boss monsters and other extra-smart foes.</p><p></p><p>I wonder if the 4E DMG will have some suggestions on this?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dausuul, post: 4107229, member: 58197"] Well, no need to pile on the "wolves use smart tactics" bandwagon. So... I assume that a monster has whatever instincts are required to use its abilities in a generally sound fashion. If something has a breath weapon, for example, it will try to blast a group of opponents in preference to a single target; even with animal intelligence, that should be an instinctive behavior. If it gets bonuses for a bunch of it piling on the same target, then it will pile on. Beyond that, I use the following broad strategies for monsters: [b]Mindless[/b]. Pick the nearest target, charge it, and maul it until either it's dead or you are. If multiple nearest targets, choose at random, or whichever looks tastiest. This level of tactics I usually reserve for zombies, giant insects, and so on. [b]Retaliatory[/b]. Pick whichever target is dishing out the most damage. This is what I often use for monsters that are not terribly bright and are either fighting solo or don't coordinate well. An ogre is likely to use this strategy--bash the one who's hurting you. [b]Wolfpack[/b]. Haven't actually used this much, but I plan to do more of it in 4E. As a group, pick whichever target looks weakest and take it down, while avoiding its stronger allies. Good for reasonably smart pack hunters, like wolves and gnolls. [b]Soldier[/b]. This monster understands the principles of D&D combat--concentrate firepower, kill spellcasters first, guard your own casters, don't go toe-to-toe with the raging barbarian, avoid letting sneaky-looking people flank you. At the same time, it isn't a tactical genius and doesn't come up with really clever plans. Appropriate for intelligent fighters experienced in organized warfare, like hobgoblins. [b]Boss Monster[/b]. This is where I pull out all the stops and play the monster as if I were running a PC, using every nasty tactic I can think of. Appropriate for intelligent boss monsters and other extra-smart foes. I wonder if the 4E DMG will have some suggestions on this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tactical Quotient (TQ) for monsters
Top