Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Take 20 on Aid Another?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greenfield" data-source="post: 5704829" data-attributes="member: 6669384"><p>The person Aiding needs to "Take 20" once for each time the primary person attempts the check. Since "Take 20" presumes that you are, in essence, attempting 20 times, that's 20 x 20, or 400.</p><p></p><p>So yeah, in essence your time consumed is 400 times longer than a single check. Try it and see. Roll a D20 with each hand, and count how many times it takes to roll 20s on each at the same time.</p><p></p><p>On average, you'll get a single 20 once every twenty rolls. On average, you'll get the double 20 once in 400 rolls.</p><p></p><p>Now, let's assume that it's only the person Aiding who takes 20, and the primary worker isn't. The primary worker still needs to make a skill check once for each of the 20 checks in the "Take 20" of the aiding person. So the Aid might get his 20 on a check when the primary person rolled lousy. Dice work that way sometimes.</p><p></p><p>So it still takes more than 20 times as long. It takes 20 times as long *times* the number of times it takes for the primary to roll well enough to succeed with the Aid of another. And if they can't succeed without that +2, it means that they need a 19 or higher, so they're pretty much doing a Take 20 of their own anyway. Which brings us back to "Take 400". (You want to argue for "Take 380", I won't fight you. It's still ridiculous.)</p><p></p><p>But the whole thing can be simplified nicely.</p><p></p><p>The rules say you can't "Take 10" or "Take 20" when aiding another on a skill check. That should settle it. (Not that I believe it will, of course.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greenfield, post: 5704829, member: 6669384"] The person Aiding needs to "Take 20" once for each time the primary person attempts the check. Since "Take 20" presumes that you are, in essence, attempting 20 times, that's 20 x 20, or 400. So yeah, in essence your time consumed is 400 times longer than a single check. Try it and see. Roll a D20 with each hand, and count how many times it takes to roll 20s on each at the same time. On average, you'll get a single 20 once every twenty rolls. On average, you'll get the double 20 once in 400 rolls. Now, let's assume that it's only the person Aiding who takes 20, and the primary worker isn't. The primary worker still needs to make a skill check once for each of the 20 checks in the "Take 20" of the aiding person. So the Aid might get his 20 on a check when the primary person rolled lousy. Dice work that way sometimes. So it still takes more than 20 times as long. It takes 20 times as long *times* the number of times it takes for the primary to roll well enough to succeed with the Aid of another. And if they can't succeed without that +2, it means that they need a 19 or higher, so they're pretty much doing a Take 20 of their own anyway. Which brings us back to "Take 400". (You want to argue for "Take 380", I won't fight you. It's still ridiculous.) But the whole thing can be simplified nicely. The rules say you can't "Take 10" or "Take 20" when aiding another on a skill check. That should settle it. (Not that I believe it will, of course.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Take 20 on Aid Another?
Top