Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Taking Unfun out of Dazed and Stunned Conditions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brainstorm" data-source="post: 5279673" data-attributes="member: 45712"><p>Well, I'd have to take each of those on a case by case basis. The Sleep spell (Wizard level 1), for example, starts off as a Slowed condition followed up by Unconsciousness on the first failed save. This is, in my opinion, a bit overpowered as it allows coup de gras to occur after the opponent (which could potentially be mulitple opponents!) goes Unconscious. If I were an evil DM (I am), I could use this to wipe out most of a party. I might house rule this to be Dazed on the 1st failed save, Stunned on the 2nd failed save and then Unconscious on the 3rd failed save, if someone is that unlucky. Dominate is not as much of a concern, because the player is still active, carrying out the action that I dictate, which is usually to attack one of their companions (and is usually funny for all involved).</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Again, I'd have to look at the powers and see if they violate my "unfun" guidelines (player inaction = unfun, BBEG ineffectiveneses = unfun). Not sure what fascination illusion you are referencing, but I would imagine that it could have a variety of effects besides stunning that would becaused by pretty lights dazzling the characters. Blindness, Slowed, Dazed, Immobile, are just some that come to mind. The big minuses represents the character being distracted, unfocused, and not as effective as when they are not under the influence of the condition.</p><p> </p><p>Speed of turns can be an issue sometimes, but even if a turn just takes 15 minutes to cycle through, it could potentially be 30 minutes or more before a player saves a Stunned condition. Out of a 4-5 hour monthly game, that's valuable play time they are left out of.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>They don't "only" care about their own actions, but they are certainly looking out for their character's best interests, and I don't fault them for that. They don't want to nerf themselves any more than I want to nerf them. In addition, I want to ensure that the opponents that I carefully select to challenge them don't become a joke when they Mark, Divine Challenge, Stun, Weaken, and Immobilize and then proceed to beat them down to 0 hp without receiving a scratch in return. That certainly doesn't convey the awe or fear a BBEG should invoke. I believe that there's an Orcus thread around here that illustrates this point nicely. That's why I want to implement a change the rules that affect everyone, not just the players or opponents.</p><p> </p><p>Also, keep in mind, this isn't something that I'm noticing on my own. The issue was brought up at Gen Con to the WotC panel and the panelists agreed that Daze and Stun can be problematic. They stated that they were consciously trying to limit the monsters they are developing with powers that inflict these conditions and they briefly talked about their own ways of dealing with this. One of them said he gave his monsters an ability to make a save against the condition. Another guy said he downgrades Stuns to Dazes. So it's not that I'm making this up, others are noticing the unfun these two conditions can cause. I'm just trying to find a way to deal with it without screwing my players or myself.</p><p> </p><p>If anyone has better ideas, I'd love to see them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brainstorm, post: 5279673, member: 45712"] Well, I'd have to take each of those on a case by case basis. The Sleep spell (Wizard level 1), for example, starts off as a Slowed condition followed up by Unconsciousness on the first failed save. This is, in my opinion, a bit overpowered as it allows coup de gras to occur after the opponent (which could potentially be mulitple opponents!) goes Unconscious. If I were an evil DM (I am), I could use this to wipe out most of a party. I might house rule this to be Dazed on the 1st failed save, Stunned on the 2nd failed save and then Unconscious on the 3rd failed save, if someone is that unlucky. Dominate is not as much of a concern, because the player is still active, carrying out the action that I dictate, which is usually to attack one of their companions (and is usually funny for all involved). Again, I'd have to look at the powers and see if they violate my "unfun" guidelines (player inaction = unfun, BBEG ineffectiveneses = unfun). Not sure what fascination illusion you are referencing, but I would imagine that it could have a variety of effects besides stunning that would becaused by pretty lights dazzling the characters. Blindness, Slowed, Dazed, Immobile, are just some that come to mind. The big minuses represents the character being distracted, unfocused, and not as effective as when they are not under the influence of the condition. Speed of turns can be an issue sometimes, but even if a turn just takes 15 minutes to cycle through, it could potentially be 30 minutes or more before a player saves a Stunned condition. Out of a 4-5 hour monthly game, that's valuable play time they are left out of. They don't "only" care about their own actions, but they are certainly looking out for their character's best interests, and I don't fault them for that. They don't want to nerf themselves any more than I want to nerf them. In addition, I want to ensure that the opponents that I carefully select to challenge them don't become a joke when they Mark, Divine Challenge, Stun, Weaken, and Immobilize and then proceed to beat them down to 0 hp without receiving a scratch in return. That certainly doesn't convey the awe or fear a BBEG should invoke. I believe that there's an Orcus thread around here that illustrates this point nicely. That's why I want to implement a change the rules that affect everyone, not just the players or opponents. Also, keep in mind, this isn't something that I'm noticing on my own. The issue was brought up at Gen Con to the WotC panel and the panelists agreed that Daze and Stun can be problematic. They stated that they were consciously trying to limit the monsters they are developing with powers that inflict these conditions and they briefly talked about their own ways of dealing with this. One of them said he gave his monsters an ability to make a save against the condition. Another guy said he downgrades Stuns to Dazes. So it's not that I'm making this up, others are noticing the unfun these two conditions can cause. I'm just trying to find a way to deal with it without screwing my players or myself. If anyone has better ideas, I'd love to see them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Taking Unfun out of Dazed and Stunned Conditions
Top