Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
talking during combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DonTadow" data-source="post: 2350915" data-attributes="member: 22622"><p>I don't think that having your players role play out strategy before combat has anything to do with the players and characters and its a far reach to compare the two. </p><p></p><p>With your logic though, why even go through the combat? Why role play for that matter? If You are correct they are a fighter and a rogue and they obviously have experience fighting. They know how to flank people and avoid aoo and how to fight so that no one dies. Their base attack is +11, just skip the combat too while we're skiipping things. And why role play? I mean they obviously have a high intelligence and charisma of course all the NPCs tell them what they want to know. Let's just fastfoward through most of the game session right to the XP. </p><p></p><p>Dms run the type of game they like. Im fine with that. But dont justify the fact that you allow your player's to metagame by trying to say that player's shouldn't treat their character's ingame with intelligence and as more than just a character sheet. In my game my players are in character unless otherwise said so. THat's why I presumed they call it ROLE playing. Strategizing beforehand is just being smart about how your players play their role. If you assume they "know better about that" you might as well assume they know better about most role playing things in game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DonTadow, post: 2350915, member: 22622"] I don't think that having your players role play out strategy before combat has anything to do with the players and characters and its a far reach to compare the two. With your logic though, why even go through the combat? Why role play for that matter? If You are correct they are a fighter and a rogue and they obviously have experience fighting. They know how to flank people and avoid aoo and how to fight so that no one dies. Their base attack is +11, just skip the combat too while we're skiipping things. And why role play? I mean they obviously have a high intelligence and charisma of course all the NPCs tell them what they want to know. Let's just fastfoward through most of the game session right to the XP. Dms run the type of game they like. Im fine with that. But dont justify the fact that you allow your player's to metagame by trying to say that player's shouldn't treat their character's ingame with intelligence and as more than just a character sheet. In my game my players are in character unless otherwise said so. THat's why I presumed they call it ROLE playing. Strategizing beforehand is just being smart about how your players play their role. If you assume they "know better about that" you might as well assume they know better about most role playing things in game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
talking during combat
Top